...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Mathematical Psychology >Biases in estimating the balance between model-free and model-based learning systems due to model misspecification
【24h】

Biases in estimating the balance between model-free and model-based learning systems due to model misspecification

机译:估算基于模型和模型的学习系统之间的平衡的偏见

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Accumulating studies support the existence of dual learning systems in decision making: one is the model-free learning system, which updates values based solely on experience; and the other is the model-based learning system, which calculates values using a complex environmental structure. A two stage decision task and its computational model have been widely used to distinguish the effects of these systems on choices. However, the computational model is often used as a tool without doubting its assumptions. In this study, we examined the possible biases in model parameter estimation due to model misspecification of a computational model. In particular, we focused on two features related to choice behavior, the existence of which was implied by the actual choice data but has not been assumed in the widely used computational models. One feature is the forgetting process, which assumes a change in unchosen option values. The other feature is gradual perseveration, which assumes that actions are positively autocorrelated with multiple preceding actions. We simulated cases in which these features relate to the choice process, but the obtained data were fit using a model that does not assume these features. We revealed that such misspecification of a fitting model can cause systematic biases in the estimation of the relative contributions of the model-free and model-based systems, implying that previous findings using the standard computational model might have been distorted by some biases. The possibility of estimation biases discussed in this study is important because the assumptions of the forgetting process and gradual perseveration, which can be combined with any reinforcement learning model, are not included in most existing models. In addition, the discussed mechanisms of the biases are widely related to basic model parameters. Using experimental data from the two-stage decision task (N = 39), we examined the associations between obsessive compulsivity and the w
机译:累积研究支持在决策中存在双学习系统:一个是无模型学习系统,其仅根据经验更新值;另一个是基于模型的学习系统,其使用复杂的环境结构计算值。两阶段决策任务及其计算模型已被广泛用于区分这些系统对选择的影响。然而,计算模型通常用作工具而不怀疑其假设。在这项研究中,我们在计算模型的模型误操作导致的模型参数估计中检查了可能的偏差。特别是,我们专注于两个与选择行为有关的特征,其存在由实际选择数据暗示,但尚未在广泛使用的计算模型中被假定。一个功能是遗忘过程,它假设未加舒收选项值的更改。另一个特征是逐步持久化,这假设动作是用多个前述动作呈正相关的。我们模拟这些特征与选择过程有关的情况,但是使用的数据使用不承担这些功能的模型拟合。我们透露,这种拟合模型的误操作可以在估计无模型和基于模型的系统的相对贡献中造成系统偏见,这意味着使用标准计算模型的先前发现可能已经被一些偏置扭曲。本研究中讨论的估计偏差的可能性很重要,因为遗忘过程和逐渐持久性的假设可以与任何加强学习模型结合在大多数现有模型中。另外,讨论的偏差机制与基本模型参数众所周的关系。使用来自两级决定任务的实验数据(n = 39),我们审查了强迫性强制与W之间的关联

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号