首页> 外文期刊>Journal of continuing education in nursing >A Comparison of Computer-based and Instructor-led Training for Long-term Care Staff
【24h】

A Comparison of Computer-based and Instructor-led Training for Long-term Care Staff

机译:基于计算机和教练LED培训的长期护理人员的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Nursing facility administrators must find new and innovative ways to meet the training needs of their staff. The authors faced the challenge of teaching nursing facility staff about fire safety using computer-based training that had been adapted from a print-based/instructor-led (IL) program. This article discusses the effectiveness of the computer-based (CB) training as compared to the effectiveness of the traditional IL format. The CB and IL versions of a fire safety training program were presented to staff of a nursing facility. The 141 participants were randomly assigned to the CB, IL, or control groups. The control group completed a pretest and posttest, but received no training until the study was completed. Both the CB and IL groups significantly increased their knowledge scores from pretest to posttest and both significantly outperformed the control group. How the participants responded to the CB training was also important. Staff reported they enjoyed the CB training and had no difficulty using the computers. Computer-based training can be an effective alternative training technique for this population.
机译:护理设施管理员必须找到满足员工培训需求的新的和创新方法。作者面临着使用基于计算机的培训教授护理设施工作人员教学的挑战,这些培训已从基于印刷的/教练LED(IL)计划改编。与传统IL格式的有效性相比,本文讨论了基于计算机的(CB)培训的有效性。消防安全培训计划的CB和IL版本向护理设施的工作人员提出。将141名参与者随机分配给CB,IL或对照组。对照组完成了一个预测试和后部,但在研究完成之前没有接受培训。 CB和IL组都显着增加了他们的知识分数从预测试到后污染,并且两者都显着优于对照组。参与者如何应对CB培训也很重要。员工报告他们享受了CB培训,并没有困难使用电脑。基于计算机的培训可以是这种人群有效的替代培训技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号