首页> 外文期刊>Journal of human nutrition and dietetics >Socioeconomic differences in food purchasing behaviour and suggested implications for diet-related health promotion.
【24h】

Socioeconomic differences in food purchasing behaviour and suggested implications for diet-related health promotion.

机译:食品采购行为的社会经济差异,并提出了对饮食有关的健康促进的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: The relationship between socioeconomic position (SEP) and diet has been examined mainly on the basis of food and nutrient intake. As a complement to this work, we focused on the socioeconomic patterning of food purchasing, as many educational dietary messages emphasize behaviours such as food choice when shopping. Also, the type of food people buy influences the quality of their nutrient intake. METHODS: A probability sample of households in Brisbane City, Australia (n = 1003, 66.4% response rate). Data were collected using face-to-face interviews. SEP was measured using education, occupation and household income. Food purchasing was examined on the basis of grocery items (including meat and chicken) and fruit and vegetables. RESULTS: Significant associations were found between each socioeconomic indicator and food purchasing. Persons from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds were less likely to purchase grocery foods that were comparatively high in fibre and low in fat, salt and sugar. The least educated, those employed in blue-collar (manual) occupations and residents of low income households purchased fewer types of fruit and vegetables, and less regularly, than their higher status counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Health promotion efforts aimed at narrowing socioeconomic differences in food purchasing need to be designed and implemented with an understanding of, and a sensitivity to, the barriers to nutritional improvement that difficult life circumstances can impose.
机译:背景:社会经济地位(SEP)与饮食之间的关系主要是在食物和营养摄入量的基础上进行检查。作为这项工作的补充,我们专注于食品采购的社会经济图案,正如许多教育饮食信息都强调购物时食品选择等行为。此外,食品的类型购买会影响其营养摄入量的质量。方法:澳大利亚布里斯班市的家庭概率样本(N = 1003,66.4%的反应率)。使用面对面的访谈收集数据。 SEP使用教育,职业和家庭收入来衡量。在杂货店(包括肉类和鸡肉)和水果和蔬菜的基础上审查了食品采购。结果:在每个社会经济指标和食品采购之间发现了重要协会。来自社会经济缺失的背景的人不太可能购买纤维,脂肪,盐和糖低相对高的杂货食品。受过频繁的教育,那些雇用的蓝领(手册)职业和低收入家庭的居民购买了更少类型的水果和蔬菜,而且经常比其更高的地位对应物。结论:健康促进旨在通过了解和敏感,难以实现困难的生活所能施加的营养改善的障碍,以设计和实施旨在缩小食品采购的社会经济差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号