首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Immunological Methods >Quantitative analysis of four protein biomarkers: An automated microfluidic cartridge-based method and its comparison to colorimetric ELISA
【24h】

Quantitative analysis of four protein biomarkers: An automated microfluidic cartridge-based method and its comparison to colorimetric ELISA

机译:四种蛋白质生物标志物的定量分析:基于自动化微流体盒的方法及其与比色酶的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Biomarker quantitation with ligand binding assays has matured greatly in recent years. This maturation has been partly in response to demands for more data points from fewer samples or less available sample volume. Multiplexing offers opportunities to acquire data for multiple analytes from single sample assay iterations, but has its own unique challenges and limitations. ProteinSimple has developed Simple Plex?, an automated immunoassay platform consisting of microfluidic cartridge-based assays run on the Ella instrument. Ella subverts traditional multiplexing challenges by rapidly performing triplicate measurements of up to four different analytes simultaneously, each in their own respective assay vessels and all from a single sample. Here we describe a comparison of the Simple Plex platform versus colorimetric ELISA and their respective abilities to quantitate four common biomarkers (MCP-1/CCL2, VEGF-A, TNF-α, and IL-6) from twenty-eight healthy individual donor plasma samples. Each biomarker was tested on the two platforms on each of two days. Ella analysis required significantly reduced sample volume, manual steps, and total time. Overall, Ella was able to quantify results for all twenty-eight samples for each of the four biomarkers. In contrast, ELISA was able to measure quantifiable results within respective calibration curve ranges for MCP-1/CCL2 (96% of samples) and VEGFA (7% of samples). For TNF-α and IL-6, ELISA was not sensitive enough to quantify any samples in the assay ranges. This stark difference in quantitative results underscores Ella's ability to multiplex without compromising sensitivity, and has far reaching potential for biomarker panel measurement in support of diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of disease. Highlights ? Automated microfluidic cartridge-based ELISA ? Multi-analyte, but not multi-plexed, analysis enables single analyte specificity and sensitivity ? In range biomarker measures correlate well with traditional ELISA measurements of same samples ? Benefits over ELISA include less assay time, lower volume requirements, increased sensitivity, & broader range
机译:近年来,用配体结合测定的抽象生物标志物定量已经大大成熟。该成熟已经部分地响应于对来自较少样本或更少的样本体积的更多数据点的要求。多路复用提供机会从单一样本测定迭代中获取多个分析物的数据,但具有自身独特的挑战和限制。蛋白质纤维已经开发出简单的Plex?,一种由ILLA仪器上的微流体盒的测定组成的自动免疫分析平台。 Ella通过同时快速执行多达四种不同的分析物的三份测量来颠覆传统的多路复用挑战,每个各自的测定血管和来自单个样品的所有分析血管。在这里,我们描述了简单的Plex平台与比色ELISA的比较以及它们各自的能力来定量来自二十八个健康个体供体等离子体的四种常见生物标志物(MCP-1 / CCL2,VEGF-A,TNF-α和IL-6)样品。每次生物标志物在两天中的每一个平台上进行测试。 Ella分析需要显着降低样品体积,手动步骤和总时间。总体而言,Ella能够为四个生物标志物中的每一个量量量化所有二十八个样品的结果。相反,ELISA能够测量MCP-1 / CCL2(样品的96%)和VEGFA(7%的样品)的各自的校准曲线范围内的可量化结果。对于TNF-α和IL-6,ELISA不足以足以量化测定范围内的任何样品。定量结果中的这种缺点差异强调了Ella在不影响敏感度的情况下复用的能力,并且对疾病诊断,预后和监测疾病的诊断,预后和监测具有远远达到生物标志物的潜力。强调 ?基于自动的微流体墨盒的ELISA?多分析物,但不是多重复合,分析使单一分析物特异性和灵敏度?在范围内,Biomarker测量与相同样品的传统ELISA测量相比良好? ELISA的益处包括较少的测定时间,更低的体积要求,增加的灵敏度,更广泛的范围

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号