首页> 外文期刊>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology: Official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology >Global electromyographic signal characteristics depend on maximal isometric contraction method in the knee extensors
【24h】

Global electromyographic signal characteristics depend on maximal isometric contraction method in the knee extensors

机译:全局电拍摄信号特性取决于膝关节伸肌中的最大等距收缩方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ObjectiveTo determine if maximal isometric contraction (MVIC) method (i.e., ramp (MVICRAMP) versus traditional MVIC) influences (1) maximal voluntary isometric torque (MVIT) production of the knee extensors, (2) electromyographic signal amplitude (EMGAMP), and (3) EMG mean power frequency (EMGMPF) of the rectus femoris and vastus lateralis in moderately-to highly-activated subjects. We hypothesized that EMGAMPwould be greater during the MVICRAMPthan MVIC muscle contractions, but that there would be no difference in MVIT.ApproachTwenty-five males (23.4?±?3.4 y; % voluntary activation?=?93.9?±?5.1%) visited the laboratory and completed MVICRAMPs and MVICs. During all contractions, leg extensor torque and sEMG signals from the vastus lateralis (VL) and rectus femoris (RF) were recorded.Main resultsThere was no significant difference in the MVIT produced (p?=?0.65) or in EMGMPF(p?=?0.052) during MVICRAMPversus MVIC. However, EMGAMPwas 18.1% higher during the MVICRAMPthan MVIC (p?=?0.004).SignificanceMaximal isometric muscle contraction method significantly influenced EMGAMP, and had a moderate effect on EMGMPF(d?=?0.49). Investigators who utilize MVICs to determine maximal EMG signal amplitude and frequency to normalize their EMG signals should be aware of these differences.
机译:ObjectiveTo确定是否最大等距收缩(MVIC)方法(即,斜坡(MVICRAMP)与传统的MVIC)影响(1)最大自愿等距扭矩(MVIT)的膝关节延伸部(2)电拍摄信号幅度(EMGAMP)的产生,和( 3)EMG平均矩阵股骨频率(EMGMPF)中适度至高度激活的受试者。我们假设在Mvicrampthan MVIC肌肉收缩期间,Emgamp会更大,但MVIT.Approachtwenty-5男性没有差异(23.4?±3.4 y;%自愿激活?=?93.9?±5.1%)访问了实验室和完成的MVICRAMPS和MVICS。在所有收缩过程中,记录来自墨水伸(VL)和直肠股骨(RF)的腿部伸肌扭矩和SEMG信号。结果结果没有显着差异,产生的mvit(p?= 0.65)或在emgmpf中(p?=在mvicrampversus mvic期间,0.052)。然而,MVICRAMPTHAN MVIC期间的EMGAMPWAs 18.1%(p?= 0.004)。令人关科的血吸脉等距肌肉收缩方法显着影响了EMGAMP,对EMGMPF进行了适度的影响(D?= 0.49)。利用MVICS确定最大EMG信号幅度和频率的调查人员应该意识到这些差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号