首页> 外文期刊>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice >Comparison of hospital outcomes and resource use in acute COPD COPD exacerbation patients managed by teaching versus nonteaching services in a community hospital
【24h】

Comparison of hospital outcomes and resource use in acute COPD COPD exacerbation patients managed by teaching versus nonteaching services in a community hospital

机译:急性Copd Copd Exacterbation患者在社区医院教学中管理的医院结果和资源用途比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Rationale, aims, and objectives The impact of teaching versus nonteaching services on outcomes and resource use in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is unknown. The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of an internal medicine teaching service compared to a nonteaching service on outcomes and resource use in patients admitted with AECOPD in a community teaching hospital. Methods A retrospective cohort study of patients admitted for a primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation to Florida Hospital Orlando, a large community teaching hospital, between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2014. Data were extracted from Premier administrative database. Risk adjusted length of stay (LOS), cost of hospitalization, 30‐day readmissions, and mortality rate were measured. Risk adjustment for outcomes was based on Premier CareScience methodology. Results A total of 1419 patients were included, 306 in the teaching group and 1113 in the nonteaching group. Risk adjusted cost and LOS were significantly lower in the teaching group compared to the nonteaching group (observed/expected cost 0.66 vs 1.06, P ??.001) and (observed/expected LOS 0.93 vs 1.69, P ??.001), respectively. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in risk adjusted mortality and readmissions ( P ?=?.48 and .89, respectively). Use of consults was significantly lower in the teaching groups with 73% vs 31% of the patient in the teaching group had no consults compared to the nonteaching group ( P ??.001). The teaching service was significantly associated with decreased use of consults after adjustment for other variables (odds ratio, 0.17, 95% CI, 0.15‐0.23, P ??.001). Conclusion The teaching service had more favorable outcomes compared to nonteaching services in patients hospitalized for AECOPD. The physician practice model has a major impact on the cost, LOS, and use of consults in patients with AECOPD.
机译:摘要基本原理,目标和目标教学对慢性阻塞性肺病(AECOPD)急性加剧患者的结果和资源用途的影响尚不清楚。该研究的目的是评估内部医学教学服务的影响与在社区教学医院患者中达到的患者的成果和资源用途的非换行服务。方法方法对慢性阻塞性肺病初步诊断的回顾性队列研究慢性阻塞性肺病的初步诊断到2011年1月1日至2014年1月1日至12月31日之间的佛罗里达医院佛罗里达州奥兰多佛罗里达州奥兰多。衡量风险调整后的住宿时间(LOS),住院费用,30天入院和死亡率。结果的风险调整是基于首屈一指的Clescience方法。结果总共包括1419名患者,319名教学集团和1113名非换行组。风险调整成本和LOS与非换行组相比,教学组显着降低(观察到/预期成本0.66 Vs 1.06,p?001)和(观察到/预期LOS 0.93 Vs 1.69,P?α.分别)。在风险调整后死亡率和入伍的2组之间没有发现显着差异(P?= 48和.89)。在教学团体中,在教学组中的31%患者的教学群体中,使用咨询率明显降低,与非换行组(P?& 001)没有咨询。在对其他变量调整后,教学服务与咨询后的使用情况显着显着相关(0.17,95%CI,0.15-0.23,P≤001)。结论与AECOPD住院的患者的无换班相比,教学服务与非换班相比具有更有利的结果。医生练习模式对AECOPD患者咨询的成本,洛斯和使用的主要影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号