首页> 外文期刊>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice >Physicians' communication of risks from non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs and attitude towards providing adverse drug reaction information to patients
【24h】

Physicians' communication of risks from non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs and attitude towards providing adverse drug reaction information to patients

机译:医生对非甾体类抗炎药物的风险和向患者提供不良药物反应信息的态度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Rationale, aims, and objectives Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are frequently prescribed for orthopaedic conditions, therefore this study aimed to explore orthopaedic physicians' perceptions of their role in NSAID‐risk communication, their attitudes towards the necessity of informing patients about adverse drug reactions (ADR), and factors associated with these. Methods Self‐administered questionnaires were mailed to all 206 orthopaedic physicians working at hospitals in Northeastern Thailand. Attitudes were assessed using 17 statements and total scores classed as poor, moderate and good attitude. Results Sixty‐six questionnaires were returned (32.04%). The responses showed that 75% of physicians claimed to communicate NSAID ADR information, more frequently about gastrointestinal (GI) complications, than about renal and cardiovascular (CVS) complications. ADR management (36%) and monitoring (30%) were not frequently communicated. The time spent with patients was associated with provision of ADR and monitoring advice. Renal function was the risk factor of greatest concern for prescribing any NSAID, followed by history of GI complications, and allergy for non‐selective NSAIDs, and history of CVS diseases and age for selective COX‐2 NSAIDs. Most physicians (41) had moderate attitude towards providing information and 24 good attitude. Fewer physicians working in tertiary hospitals than general and community hospital physicians considered that time limitations prevented counseling and that patient information leaflets offered easily accessible information. Additionally, more physicians who did not inform patients about ADRs agreed that ADR communication can lead to anxiety and discontinuing treatment. Conclusion The study indicates that, although orthopaedic physicians had positive attitudes towards providing ADR information to patients, improvement is needed in communicating NSAID risk information.
机译:摘要摘要理由,目标和目标非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)经常为整形外科条件开展,因此本研究旨在探讨骨科医生对他们在NSAID-CANIGING沟通中的作用的看法,他们对通知患者的必要性的态度不良药物反应(ADR)和与这些相关的因素。方法自我管理的问卷邮寄给泰国东北部门工作的所有206名骨科医生。使用17个陈述和总分归类为贫困,中等和良好的态度评估态度。结果返回了66名问卷(32.04%)。回复表明,75%的医生声称将NSAID ADR信息更频繁地传达胃肠道(GI)并发症,而不是关于肾病和心血管(CVS)并发症。 ADR管理(36%)和监测(30%)没有经常传达。与患者花费的时间与提供ADR和监测建议有关。肾功能是最重要的危险因素,对所有NSAID进行规定,其次是GI并发症的历史,以及对选择性COX-2 NSAIDs的CVS疾病和年龄的过敏。大多数医生(41)对提供信息和24个良好态度有适度的态度。在高级医院工作的医生少于一般和社区医院医师认为时间限制阻止了咨询,并且患者信息传单提供了轻松无障碍的信息。此外,更多没有通知患者关于ADR的医生同意ADR通信可能导致焦虑和停止治疗。结论该研究表明,虽然骨科医生对向患者提供了向患者提供ADR信息的积极态度,但在沟通NSAID风险信息时需要改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号