首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Food Science and Technology >Comparative evaluation of maceration, microwave and ultrasonic-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from propolis
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of maceration, microwave and ultrasonic-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from propolis

机译:蜂胶,微波和超声波辅助提取来自蜂胶的酚类化合物的比较评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare different techniques in order to achieve a high extraction of phenolic compounds from propolis. For this purpose, it was investigated the use of double maceration (24 h at room temperature with continuous agitation at 250 rpm), double microwave treatments (1 min at 140 W) and double ultrasound-assisted extraction (15 min at 20 kHz) using 70% ethanol. The extraction efficiency was measured based on extraction yield, total phenolic content, flavones and flavonol content, and flavanone and dihydroflavonol content. The ultrasonic extraction had an extraction yield higher than microwave extraction and maceration. The yield of the propolis ranged between samples and between the years of propolis harvesting. Of the twelve quantified phenolic compounds, p-coumaric acid was the most abundant (271.65 mg/g propolis).
机译:本研究的目的是比较不同的技术,以便高促进来自蜂胶的酚类化合物。 为此目的,研究了双浸渍(在室温下在250rpm下连续搅拌24小时),双微波处理(140W),双重超声辅助提取(20 kHz 15分钟)使用 70%乙醇。 基于萃取产率,总酚含量,黄酮和黄酮醇含量和黄烷酮和二氢烷醇含量测量提取效率。 超声萃取的提取产率高于微波萃取和浸渍。 蜂胶的产量在样品之间以及多年的蜂胶收获之间。 在十二个定量的酚类化合物中,对p-香豆酸是最丰富(271.65mg / g蜂胶)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号