...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of developmental origins of health and disease >Antenatal non-medical risk assessment and care pathways to improve pregnancy outcomes: a cluster randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Antenatal non-medical risk assessment and care pathways to improve pregnancy outcomes: a cluster randomized controlled trial

机译:产前非医疗风险评估和护理途径,以改善妊娠结果:一组随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Social deprivation negatively affects health outcomes. In addition to the negative impact of medical and obstetric risk factors, multiple studies have shown a strong association between non-medical risk factors and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Risk assessment and subsequent implementation of preventive measures in antenatal health care with the aim to reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes should, therefore, take both medical and non-medical risk factors into account. The aim of this study was to determine whether a combination of risk assessment for non-medical factors during pregnancy, with subsequent use of care pathways, and the institution of personalised preventive care decreases the incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes at birth. Methods: Cluster randomized controlled trial in 14 urban municipalities across the Netherlands. The combined intervention consisted of antenatal risk assessment, focused on non-medical risk factors, lifestyle factors, and medical risk factors, using the Rotterdam Reproductive Risk Reduction (R4U) scorecard, and the subsequent institution of risk-specific care pathways and multidisciplinary consultation between care providers from the curative and the public health sector. The primary outcome was delivery of a preterm and/or a small for gestational age baby, analyzed with multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analysis adjusting for cluster and individual baseline characteristics. Results: Data from 4302 participants across ten clusters was included in the intention to treat analysis. The intervention had no demonstrable impact on the primary outcome: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.17 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.63). There was a statistically significant improvement in early detection of threatening preterm delivery and/or fetal growth restriction during pregnancy in the intervention clusters: aOR 1.27 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.61). Conclusions: Implementation of additional non-medical risk assessment and preventive strategies into general practices is feasible but did not decrease the incidence of our primary outcome in the index pregnancy in deprived urban areas.
机译:背景:社会剥夺对健康结果产生负面影响。除了医学和产科危险因素的负面影响外,多项研究表明了非医疗危险因素与不良妊娠结果之间的强烈关联。因此,旨在减少不良妊娠成果的产前医疗保健的预防措施的风险评估及随后的实施应考虑到医疗和非医疗风险因素。本研究的目的是确定怀孕期间非医疗因素的风险评估是否结合,随后使用护理途径,以及个性化预防性护理制度降低了出生时不良新生儿结果的发生率。方法:在荷兰14个城市城市中集群随机对照试验。综合干预由不医疗风险因素,生活方式因素和医疗危险因素的产前风险评估组成,使用鹿特丹生殖风险减少(R4U)记分卡,以及随后的风险特定护理途径和多学科咨询来自治疗和公共卫生部门的护理提供者。主要结果是递送早产和/或小于孕龄婴儿的小,用多级混合效应物流回归分析进行分析,调整集群和单独的基线特征。结果:来自10个集群的4302名参与者的数据被列入意图治疗分析。干预对主要结果没有明显的影响:调整后的差距(AOR)1.17(95%CI 0.84至1.63)。在干预簇中妊娠期间早期发现威胁早产输送和/或胎儿生长限制存在统计学意义:AOR 1.27(95%CI 1.01至1.61)。结论:实施额外的非医疗风险评估和预防策略进入一般做法是可行的,但没有减少剥夺城市地区指标怀孕的主要结果的发病率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号