首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Antenatal non-medical risk assessment and care pathways to improve pregnancy outcomes: a cluster randomised controlled trial
【2h】

Antenatal non-medical risk assessment and care pathways to improve pregnancy outcomes: a cluster randomised controlled trial

机译:产前非医学风险评估和改善怀孕结局的护理途径:一项随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Social deprivation negatively affects health outcomes but receives little attention in obstetric risk selection. We investigated whether a combination of (1) risk assessment focused on non-medical risk factors, lifestyle factors, and medical risk factors, with (2) subsequent institution of risk-specific care pathways, and (3) multidisciplinary consultation between care providers from the curative and the public health sector reduced adverse pregnancy outcomes among women in selected urban areas in the Netherlands. We conducted a cluster randomised controlled trial in 14 urban municipalities across the Netherlands. Prior to the randomisation, municipalities were ranked and paired according to their expected proportion of pregnant women at risk for adverse outcomes at birth. The primary outcome was delivery of a preterm and/or small for gestational age (SGA) baby, analysed with multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analysis adjusting for clustering and individual baseline characteristics. A total of 33 community midwife practices and nine hospitals participated throughout the study. Data from 4302 participants was included in the Intention To Treat (ITT) analysis. The intervention had no demonstrable impact on the primary outcome: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.17 (95% CI 0.84–1.63). Among the secondary outcomes, the intervention improved the detection of threatening preterm delivery and fetal growth restriction during pregnancy [aOR 1.27 (95% CI 1.01–1.61)]. Implementation of additional non-medical risk assessment and preventive strategies into general practices is feasible but did not decrease the incidence of preterm and/or SGA birth in the index pregnancy in deprived urban areas.Trial registration Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR-3367).Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s10654-018-0387-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:社会剥夺对健康结局有负面影响,但在产科风险选择中却很少受到关注。我们调查了(1)风险评估是否侧重于非医学风险因素,生活方式因素和医学风险因素,以及(2)随后建立了风险特定的护理途径,以及(3)护理人员之间的多学科咨询的组合治疗和公共卫生部门减少了荷兰某些城市地区妇女的不良妊娠结局。我们在荷兰的14个城市进行了整群随机对照试验。在随机分组之前,根据市镇在出生时有不良后果风险的孕妇的预期比例对市镇进行排名和配对。主要结局是为胎龄(SGA)婴儿提供早产和/或早产,并通过多层次混合效应逻辑回归分析进行了分析,并针对聚类和个体基线特征进行了调整。在整个研究过程中,共有33种社区助产士做法和9所医院参加了培训。来自4302名参与者的数据已包括在治疗意向(ITT)分析中。干预对主要结局无明显影响:调整后的优势比(aOR)为1.17(95%CI 0.84–1.63)。在次要结果中,该干预措施改善了妊娠期威胁性早产和胎儿生长受限的检测[aOR 1.27(95%CI 1.01–1.61)]。在普通实践中实施其他非医学风险评估和预防策略是可行的,但并不能降低贫困城市地区妊娠指数中早产和/或SGA出生的发生率。试用注册荷兰国家试验注册(NTR-3367)。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(10.1007 / s10654-018-0387-7)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号