首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Potential of Tricalcium Silicate-based Cements Using Human Bone Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells
【24h】

Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Potential of Tricalcium Silicate-based Cements Using Human Bone Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells

机译:利用人骨髓源性间充质干细胞评价硅酸钙基水泥的生物相容性和成骨潜力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: The success of endodontic regeneration lies in the appropriate combination of stem cells and bioactive materials. Several novel dental materials are available on the market in this regard. Hence, the current study aimed to evaluate the proliferation, differentiation, and osteogenic potential of human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs) onto biomaterials like ProRoot MTA (MTA; Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK), Biodentine (BD; Septodont, Saint Maur de Fosses, France), and EndoSequence Root Repair Material (ERRM; Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA). Methods: Dental cements were formulated into discs and assessed for their biocompatibility. hBMSCs were used to study biocompatitibility and the proliferative and osteogenic potential of these dental cements. A live dead assay was performed using confocal microscopy to study the biocompatibility, proliferation, and cell attachment property of the cements. An 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay was also performed on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 to study growth kinetics. The osteogenic potential of these cements was studied by inducing hBMSCs over them using osteogenic differentiation medium (assessed by alkaline phosphatase assay). Results: ERRM and MTA have shown the best biocompatibility among the tricalcium silicate materials used with no significant difference between them. Both have shown significantly higher osteogenic bioactivity than BD. All 3 tricalcium silicate cements support good adherence of hBMSCs. Conclusions: All of the dental cements used in this study are biocompatible with the potential to induce proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs. Therefore, the newly introduced ERRM can be the material of choice in various endodontic applications.
机译:简介:牙髓再生的成功位于干细胞和生物活性材料的适当组合。在这方面可以在市场上提供几种新型牙科材料。因此,目前的研究旨在评估人骨髓衍生的间充质干细胞(HBMSCs)的增殖,分化和成骨潜力在Proroot MTA(MTA; Lutsa牙科牙科,Tulsa,OK),生物endine(BD; Seedodont,圣马尔德陶瓷,法国)和内托基根修复材料(errm;罗拉尔美国,萨凡纳,GA)。方法:将牙科水泥配制成椎间盘并评估其生物相容性。 HBMSCS用于研究这些牙科水泥的生物相容性和增殖和骨质发生潜力。使用共聚焦显微镜进行实时死亡测定,以研究水泥的生物相容性,增殖和细胞附着性能。还在第1,3,5和7天进行3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基)-2,5-二苯基四唑鎓溴化物测定以研究生长动力学。通过使用骨质分化培养基诱导HBMSCs(通过碱性磷酸酶测定评估)通过诱导HBMSC来研究这些水泥的骨质发生潜力。结果:Errm和MTA在硅酸钙材料中显示出最佳的生物相容性,它们之间没有显着差异。两者都显示出比BD的显着更高的成骨生物活性。所有3个硅酸钙水泥都支持HBMSC的良好粘附。结论:本研究中使用的所有牙科水泥都是生物相容的,促使HBMSCs的增殖和骨质发生分化的潜力。因此,新引入的errm可以是各种牙髓应用中的选择材料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号