首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dentistry >Cost-effectiveness analysis of two impression methods for the fabrication of mandibular complete dentures
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness analysis of two impression methods for the fabrication of mandibular complete dentures

机译:制造下颌完整假牙的两种印象方法的成本效益分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Objectives To compare the cost and to evaluate cost-effectiveness of fabricating mandibular complete dentures (CDs) using two different impression methods. Methods A crossover randomized controlled trial including 27 edentulous participants was performed. Mandibular CDs were fabricated using two different impression methods, as follows: (i) conventional method using a custom tray border moulded with impression compound and silicone and (ii) simplified method using a stock tray and alginate. Cost analysis was performed from a clinical practitioner’s perspective. The total cost included labor cost, which was calculated using the time spent by dentists and technicians in fabricating CDs and their hourly wages, and the material costs, which were calculated using purchase prices. To evaluate cost-effectiveness, we used general patient satisfaction as an indicator of effectiveness and calculated the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER). ICER represents the cost per one unit of effectiveness. Results The trial was completed by 24 participants. The total cost was 43,904 Japanese Yen (JPY) (330.91 EUR / 395.78 USD) for the conventional method and 39,792 JPY (299.93 EUR / 358.70 USD) for the simplified method, and this difference was statistically significant (p Conclusions The results indicated that the total cost of the conventional method was significantly higher than that of the simplified method (p Clinical significance The conventional impression method for fabricating mandibular CDs, which took additional 633 JPY (4.77 EUR / 5.70 USD) for improvement of general satisfaction, is supposed to be clinically meaningful 1 1 100JPY=0.76EUR 100JPY=0.89USD. .
机译:摘要目标要使用两种不同的印模方法比较成本并评估制造下颌完整假牙(CDS)的成本效益。方法进行包括27个营养参与者的交叉随机对照试验。使用两种不同的印模方法制造下颌CD,如下:(i)使用自定义托盘边界用压印化合物和硅氧烷模塑的常规方法和(ii)使用股票托盘和藻酸盐的简化方法。从临床从业者的角度进行成本分析。总成本包括劳动力成本,该成本使用牙医和技术人员在制造CD和每小时工资中花费的时间以及使用购买价格计算的材料成本。为了评估成本效益,我们将一般患者满意度用作有效性指标,并计算了增量成本效益率(ICER)。 ICER代表每单位有效性的成本。结果审判由24名参与者完成。总成本为43,904日元(JPY)(330.91欧元/ 395.78美元),用于传统方法,39,792日元(299.93 EUR / 358.70 USD)用于简化方法,这种差异在统计上显着(P结论结果表明结果表明了常规方法的总成本显着高于简化方法(P临床意义,常规印象的方法制造下颌CDS(4.77欧元/ 5.70美元)以提高一般满意度,应该是临床有意义1 1 100 jpy = 0.76eur 100jpy = 0.89usd。。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号