>This study examines how culture affects the normative processes implicated in cultural differences in creative behaviors. Western norms '/> Situational Salience of Norms Moderates Cultural Differences in the Originality and Usefulness of Creative Ideas Generated or Selected by Teams
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cross-cultural psychology >Situational Salience of Norms Moderates Cultural Differences in the Originality and Usefulness of Creative Ideas Generated or Selected by Teams
【24h】

Situational Salience of Norms Moderates Cultural Differences in the Originality and Usefulness of Creative Ideas Generated or Selected by Teams

机译:规范的情境显着性适度地调节了团队生成或选择的创意的原创性和有用性的文化差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

>This study examines how culture affects the normative processes implicated in cultural differences in creative behaviors. Western norms prioritize originality and Eastern norms usefulness. In a cross-cultural study, we found significant performance differences in terms of originality and usefulness between Americans and Taiwanese only when these norms were salient, as when the task required individuals to select ideas (vs. generate new ideas) or to work in a group (vs. work alone). Compared with Taiwanese, Americans generated more original ideas when they worked in a grouporwhen the task required them to select ideas for further elaboration. When required to select ideas in a group, norms were most salient and Americans’ relative advantage over Taiwanese in originality was most pronounced. In contrast, compared with Americans, Taiwanese generated more useful ideas when they worked in a grouporwhen the task required them to select ideas for further elaboration. When required to select ideas in a group, Taiwanese’s advantage over Americans in usefulness was most pronounced. Moreover, although Americans and Taiwanese were equally capable of generating original and useful ideas, Taiwanese teams tended to express useful ideas and hold back original ones in group discussion. In contrast, American teams tended to hold back useful ideas. The theoretical and future research implications of these findings are discussed.]]>
机译:<![cdata [ >本研究检查文化如何影响创造性行为中涉及文化差异的规范性过程。西方规范优先考虑原创性和东方规范的实用性。在跨文化研究中,我们在这些规范突出时发现了美国人和台湾人之间的原创性和有用性的显着差异,就像任务需要个人选择想法(与生成新想法)或工作小组(独自工作)。与台湾人相比,美国人在<斜斜体>或在组合中工作时产生了更多原创的想法,当任务需要它们选择以选择进一步阐述的想法。当需要选择在一组中的想法时,规范最大,而美国人在原创性上的相对优势是最明显的。相比之下,与美国人相比,台湾人在一个组合在<斜体>或中工作时产生了更有用的想法,当任务需要它们选择以选择进一步阐述的想法。在需要选择一个集团的想法时,台湾人对美国有用性的优势最为明显。此外,虽然美国人和台湾人同样能够产生原创和有用的思路,但台湾团队往往表达了有用的想法并将原始人抱在小组讨论中。相比之下,美国团队往往遏制有用的想法。讨论了这些发现的理论和未来的研究意义。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号