首页> 外文期刊>Journal of computer assisted tomography >Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Comparison to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Lesions
【24h】

Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Comparison to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Lesions

机译:对比度增强光谱乳房X线摄影与乳房病变中磁共振成像的诊断值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value between contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast disease. Methods Two hundred thirty-five patients who were suspected of having breast abnormalities by clinical examination or mammography underwent CESM and MRI examination. Using histopathologic results as the criterion standard, the diagnostic performance of CESM and MRI was investigated. The areas under receiver operating characteristic curves were applied to analyze diagnostic efficiency. The Pearson correlation coefficients between CESM versus pathology and MRI versus pathology were calculated. Results Two hundred sixty-three breast lesions were found in 235 patients, in which 177 were malignant and 86 were benign. By evaluating the diagnostic value, sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and false-negative rate from CESM examination were comparable to those from MRI (91.5%, 94.7%, 83.7%, and 8.5% vs 91.5%, 90.5%, 82.1%, and 8.5%). Importantly, the accuracy and the specificity were higher for CESM than those for MRI (81% and 89.5% vs 80.2% and 71.7%), whereas the false-positive rate was lower (10.5% vs 19.8%). The areas under receiver operating characteristic curves of CESM and MRI were 0.950 and 0.939, displaying the equivalent diagnostic efficiency (P = 0.48). For the agreement between measurements, mean tumor sizes were 3.1 cm for CESM and 3.4 cm for MRI compared with 3.2 cm on histopathologic results. The Pearson correlation coefficient of CESM versus histopathology (r = 0.774, P = 0.000) was consistent with MRI versus histopathology (r = 0.771, P = 0.000). Conclusions Our results show better accuracy, specificity, and false-positive rate of CESM in breast cancer detection than MRI. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography displayed a good correlation with histopathology in assessing the lesion size of breast cancer, which is consistent with MRI.
机译:目的本研究的目的是评估乳腺疾病中对比增强光谱乳腺X线摄影(CESM)和乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)之间的诊断价值。方法临床检查或乳房X线摄影的二百三十五名患者被临床检查或乳腺癌接受CESM和MRI检查。使用组织病理学结果作为标准标准,研究了CESM和MRI的诊断性能。接收器操作特征曲线下的区域被应用于分析诊断效率。计算CESM与病理学和MRI与病理学之间的Pearson相关系数。结果235名患者发现了两百六十三六十三个乳房病变,其中177名是恶性的,86例是良性。通过评估CESM检查的诊断价值,敏感性,阳性预测值,阴性预测值和假阴性率与来自MRI(91.5%,94.7%,83.7%和8.5%vs 91.5%,90.5%, 82.1%和8.5%)。重要的是,CESM的准确性和特异性比MRI的精度更高(81%和89.5%与80.2%和71.7%),而假阳性率较低(10.5%Vs 19.8%)。 CESM和MRI的接收器操作特性曲线下的区域为0.950和0.939,显示等效诊断效率(P = 0.48)。对于测量之间的协议,CESM的平均肿瘤尺寸为3.1cm,MRI为3.4厘米,而组织病理学结果为3.2厘米。 CESM与组织病理学的Pearson相关系数(R = 0.774,p = 0.000)与MRI与组织病理学一致(R = 0.771,P = 0.000)一致。结论我们的结果表明,乳腺癌检测中CESM的更好的准确性,特异性和假阳性率,而不是MRI。对比增强的光谱乳房X线摄影与组织病理学呈现出良好的相关性,用于评估乳腺癌的病变大小,这与MRI一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号