首页> 外文期刊>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology >A Randomized Controlled Trial of Central Executive Training (CET) Versus Inhibitory Control Training (ICT) for ADHD
【24h】

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Central Executive Training (CET) Versus Inhibitory Control Training (ICT) for ADHD

机译:ADHD的中央执行培训(CET)的随机对照试验与抑制控制培训(ICT)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Executive function deficits are well-established in ADHD. Unfortunately, replicated evidence indicates that executive function training for ADHD has been largely unsuccessful. We hypothesized that this may reflect insufficient targeting, such that extant protocols do not sufficiently and specifically target the neurocognitive systems associated with phenotypic ADHD behaviors/impairments. Method: Children with ADHD ages 8-12 (M = 10.41, SD = 1.46; 12 girls; 74% Caucasian/Non-Hispanic) were randomized with allocation concealment to either central executive training (CET; n = 25) or newly developed inhibitory control training (ICT; n = 29). Detailed data analytic plans were preregistered. Results: Both treatments were feasible/acceptable based on training duration, child-reported ease of use, and parent-reported high satisfaction. CET was superior to ICT for improving its primary intervention targets: phonological and visuospatial working memory (d = 0.70-0.84). CET was also superior to ICT for improving go/no-go (d = 0.84) but not stop-signal inhibition. Mechanisms of change analyses indicated that CET-related working memory improvements produced significant reductions in the primary clinical endpoints (objectively assessed hyperactivity) during working memory and inhibition testing (indirect effects: beta >= -.11; 95% CIs exclude 0.0). CET was also superior to ICT on 3 of 4 secondary clinical endpoints (blinded teacher-rated ADHD symptoms; d = 0.46-0.70 vs. 0.16-0.42) and 2 of 4 feasibility/acceptability clinical endpoints (parent-reported ADHD symptoms; d = 0.96-1.42 vs. 0.45-0.65). CET-related gains were maintained at 2-4 month follow-up; ICT-related gains were maintained for attention problems but not hyperactivity/impulsivity per parent report. Conclusions: Results support the use of CET for treating executive function deficits and targeting ADHD behavioral symptoms in children with ADHD. Findings for ICT were mixed at best and indicate the need for continued development/study.
机译:目的:执行职能赤字在ADHD中良好。不幸的是,复制的证据表明ADHD的执行职能培训基本上是不成功的。我们假设这可能反映不充分的靶向,使得现时方案不能充分,并且特异性地靶向与表型ADHD行为/损伤相关的神经认知系统。方法:ADHD年龄8-12岁的儿童(M = 10.41,SD = 1.46; 12个女孩; 74%白种人/非西班牙裔人)随着核心执行培训(CET; N = 25)或新开发的抑制来随机分配隐瞒控制培训(ICT; N = 29)。详细的数据分析计划进行了预期。结果:两种治疗方法可行/可接受,基于培训持续时间,儿童报告的易用性和父母报告的高满意度。 CET优于ICT,以改善其初级干预目标:语音和探测工作记忆(D = 0.70-0.84)。 CET也优于ICT,用于改进GO / NO-GO(D = 0.84)但不是停止信号抑制。变化机制分析表明,相关的工作记忆力改善在工作记忆和抑制测试期间产生了初级临床终点(客观评估的多动)的显着减少(间接影响:β> = -111; 95%CIS排除0.0)。 CET在4个中学临床终点中的3个(盲教老师级的ADHD症状)也优于ICT; D = 0.46-0.70与0.16-0.42)和4个可行性/可接受性临床终点(父母报告的ADHD症状; D = 0.96-1.42 vs. 0.45-0.65)。与CET相关的收益在2-4个月的随访中保持;与ICT相关的收益保持注意力问题,但每个父母报告的多动/冲动。结论:结果支持CET用于治疗执行职能赤字,靶向ADHD儿童的ADHD行为症状。 ICT的结果最多混合,并表明需要持续发展/研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号