首页> 外文期刊>AIDS >Week 48 results from a randomized clinical trial of rilpivirine/ emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs. efavirenz/emtricitabine/ tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected adults
【24h】

Week 48 results from a randomized clinical trial of rilpivirine/ emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs. efavirenz/emtricitabine/ tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected adults

机译:第48周是在未经HIV-1感染的未成年人中使用rilpivirine /恩曲他滨/替诺福韦富马酸替诺福韦vs efavirenz / emtricitabine /替诺福韦

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of the two single-tablet regimens (STRs), rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (RPV/FTC/TDF) and efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (EFV/FTC/TDF), in HIV-1-infected, treatment-naive adults. Design: This is a phase 3b, randomized, open-label, multicenter, international, 96-week study. Methods: Participants were randomized 1 : 1 to receive either RPV/FTC/TDF or EFV/FTC/TDF. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml at week 48 by the Snapshot algorithm. Results: A total of 786 participants were randomized. RPV/FTC/TDF was noninferior to EFV/FTC/TDF (85.8 vs. 81.6%) at week 48 for HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml [difference 4.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1 to 9.2%]. A statistically significant difference in efficacy favoring RPV/FTC/TDF was demonstrated for participants with baseline HIV-1 RNA 100 000 copies/ml or less [(n=510) 88.8% RPV/FTC/TDF vs. 81.6% EFV/FTC/TDF (difference 7.2%, 95% CI 1.1-13.4%)]. In participants with baseline HIV-1 RNA more than 100 000 copies/ml (n=276), RPV/FTC/TDF demonstrated noninferior efficacy compared with EFV/FTC/TDF (79.9 vs. 81.7%, respectively, difference-1.8%, 95% CI-11.1 to 7.5%). In the RPV/FTC/TDF arm, more virologic failure was observed as baseline HIV-1 RNA levels increased. There were more participants with emergent resistance in the RPV/FTC/TDF arm than in the EFV/FTC/TDF arm (4 vs 1%, respectively). There were fewer discontinuations because of adverse events with RPV/FTC/TDF (2.5%) than with EFV/FTC/TDF (8.7%). Conclusion: In treatment-naive participants, RPV/FTC/TDF demonstrated noninferior efficacy and improved tolerability compared with EFV/FTC/TDF, as well as a statistically significant difference in efficacy for participants with baseline HIV-1 RNA 100 000 copies/ml or less at week 48.
机译:目的:比较两种单片治疗方案(STRs),利匹韦林/恩曲他滨/替诺福韦富马酸替诺福韦酯(RPV / FTC / TDF)和依非韦伦/恩曲他滨/替诺福韦DF(EFV / FTC / TDF),在艾滋病毒中的安全性和有效性-1感染的未治疗成人。设计:这是3b期,随机,开放标签,多中心,国际,96周的研究。方法:将参与者1:1随机分配至RPV / FTC / TDF或EFV / FTC / TDF。主要终点是通过快照算法在第48周时HIV-1 RNA低于50拷贝/ ml的参与者的比例。结果:共有786名参与者被随机分组​​。对于小于50拷贝/ ml的HIV-1 RNA,RPV / FTC / TDF在48周时不逊于EFV / FTC / TDF(85.8对81.6%)[差异4.1%,95%置信区间(CI)1.1至9.2% ]。对于基线HIV-1 RNA等于或小于100 000拷贝/ ml的参与者,证明了偏爱RPV / FTC / TDF的功效有统计学意义的显着性差异[(n = 510)RPV / FTC / TDF为88.8%,EFV / FTC /为81.6% TDF(差异7.2%,95%CI 1.1-13.4%)。在基线HIV-1 RNA超过100000拷贝/ ml(n = 276)的受试者中,RPV / FTC / TDF的疗效优于EFV / FTC / TDF(分别为79.9和81.7%,差异为1.8%, 95%CI-11.1至7.5%)。在RPV / FTC / TDF组中,随着基线HIV-1 RNA水平的升高,观察到了更多的病毒学衰竭。 RPV / FTC / TDF组比EFV / FTC / TDF组出现紧急抵抗的参与者更多(分别为4%和1%)。与RPV / FTC / TDF的不良事件(2.5%)相比,EFV / FTC / TDF的不良事件(8.7%)更少。结论:与EFV / FTC / TDF相比,未经治疗的参与者RPV / FTC / TDF表现出同等的疗效,耐受性得到改善,并且基线HIV-1 RNA为100 000拷贝/ ml或在第48周减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号