...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology >Reliability and validity of a self-administered tool for online neuropsychological testing: The Amsterdam Cognition Scan
【24h】

Reliability and validity of a self-administered tool for online neuropsychological testing: The Amsterdam Cognition Scan

机译:在线神经心理学检测的自我管理工具的可靠性和有效性:阿姆斯特丹认知扫描

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: To facilitate large-scale assessment of a variety of cognitive abilities in clinical studies, we developed a self-administered online neuropsychological test battery: the Amsterdam Cognition Scan (ACS). The current studies evaluate in a group of adult cancer patients: test-retest reliability of the ACS and the influence of test setting (home or hospital), and the relationship between our online and a traditional test battery (concurrent validity). Method: Test-retest reliability was studied in 96 cancer patients (57 female; Mage = 51.8 years) who completed the ACS twice. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess consistency over time. The test setting was counterbalanced between home and hospital; influence on test performance was assessed by repeated measures analyses of variance. Concurrent validity was studied in 201 cancer patients (112 female; Mage = 53.5 years) who completed both the online and an equivalent traditional neuropsychological test battery. Spearman or Pearson correlations were used to assess consistency between online and traditional tests. Results: ICCs of the online tests ranged from .29 to .76, with an ICC of .78 for the ACS total score. These correlations are generally comparable with the test-retest correlations of the traditional tests as reported in the literature. Correlating online and traditional test scores, we observed medium to large concurrent validity (r/p = .42 to .70; total score r = .78), except for a visuospatial memory test (p = .36). Correlations were affected-as expectedby design differences between online tests and their offline counterparts. Conclusions: Although development and optimization of the ACS is an ongoing process, and reliability can be optimized for several tests, our results indicate that it is a highly usable tool to obtain (online) measures of various cognitive abilities. The ACS is expected to facilitate efficient gathering of data on cognitive functioning in the near future.
机译:简介:为了促进临床研究中各种认知能力的大规模评估,我们开发了一种自我管理的在线神经心理学测试电池:Amsterdam认知扫描(ACS)。目前的研究在一组成人癌症患者中评估:ACS的测试 - 保持可靠性以及测试环境(家庭或医院)的影响,以及我们在线和传统的测试电池(并发有效性)之间的关系。方法:96例癌症患者(57名女性;法师= 51.8岁)研究了试验 - 重度可靠性。脑内相关系数(ICC)用于评估一致时间。测试设定在家庭和医院之间平衡;通过反复措施对方差分析评估对测试性能的影响。在201癌患者中研究了同时有效性(112名女性;法师= 53.5岁),他们完成了在线和同等的传统神经心理学测试电池。 Spearman或Pearson相关性用于评估在线和传统测试之间的一致性。结果:在线测试的ICC为.29到.76,有一个ICC的.78,ACS总分。这些相关性通常与文献中报道的传统测试的测试保持相关性相当。在线和传统的测试分数相关,我们观察到媒体到大的并发有效性(R / P = .42至.70;总得分r = .78),除了探测空间内存测试(p = .36)。受影响的相关性 - 在线测试与其离线对应物之间的预期设计差异。结论:虽然ACS的开发和优化是一个持续的过程,但可以针对几次测试优化可靠性,我们的结果表明它是获得各种认知能力的(在线)测量的高度可用工具。期望ACS有助于在不久的将来有效地收集关于认知功能的数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号