首页> 外文期刊>Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology >Treatment Patterns, Health Care Resource Utilization, and Health Care Cost Associated with Atypical Antipsychotics or Guanfacine Extended Release in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Quebec, Canada
【24h】

Treatment Patterns, Health Care Resource Utilization, and Health Care Cost Associated with Atypical Antipsychotics or Guanfacine Extended Release in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Quebec, Canada

机译:治疗模式,医疗保健资源利用以及与加拿大魁北克省魁北克的注意力/多动障碍的儿童和青少年延长释放的儿童和青少年相关的医疗保健成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To assess treatment patterns, health care resource utilization, and health care costs associated with use of atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) or the nonstimulant guanfacine extended release (GXR) after stimulant therapy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In Canada, GXR is approved as a monotherapy for children and adolescents with ADHD or as an adjunct to stimulants, and AAPs are commonly used off-label as an adjunct to stimulants. Methods: Health care claims data (January 1, 2007 to March 31, 2016) from Quebec's provincial health plan were assessed for individuals with ADHD, 6-17 years of age, who received >= 1 stimulant followed by a first AAP or GXR prescription (index medication), without a diagnosis for which AAPs are indicated. Results: Overall, 1327 individuals were included (AAPs, 1098; GXR, 229). Rates of discontinuation, augmentation, or switching of the index medication did not differ between AAPs and GXR during the first follow-up year. Discontinuation rates were significantly lower with GXR than with AAPs during the second year (22.0% vs. 35.9%; p = 0.03). GXR and AAPs resulted in similar increases in total health care cost. In GXR users, the increase in prescription drug cost after 6 months was higher than in AAP users, whereas the increase in overall medical cost was higher with AAPs than GXR, owing to more psychiatric department visits. Conclusions: In children and adolescents with ADHD who used AAPs or GXR after stimulants, secondary treatment changes were similar with both treatments after 1 year, but discontinuation rates were significantly lower with GXR than with AAPs in the second year. The greater increase in prescription cost with GXR was balanced by a greater increase in overall medical costs with AAPs, resulting in no overall difference in total health care cost between the two treatments.
机译:目的:评估与使用非典型抗精神病药(AAP)或兴奋剂的非纯粹的胍尼延长释放(GXR)评估治疗模式,医疗保健资源利用率和医疗保健费用,以进行注意力/多动障碍(ADHD)。在加拿大,GXR被批准为儿童和青少年的单一疗法,患有ADHD或兴奋剂的辅助剂,并且AAP通常被剥夺标签作为兴奋剂的辅助。方法:医疗保健声明数据(2007年1月1日至2016年3月31日)来自魁北克省卫生计划,针对具有ADHD,6-17岁的人进行评估,他们收到> = 1兴奋剂,然后是第一个AAP或GXR处方(指数用药),没有指示AAP的诊断。结果:总体而言,包括1327人(AAPS,1098; GXR,229)。在第一次随访年度期间,索引药物的中断,增强或切换的停止率并不不同。在第二年的AAP中,停药率显着降低(22.0%与35.9%; P = 0.03)。 GXR和AAP导致卫生保健成本的同类增加。在GXR用户中,6个月后处方药的增加高于AAP用户,而由于更加精神病学部门访问,整体医疗成本的增加比GXR更高。结论:在兴奋剂后使用AAP或GXR的儿童和青少年,二次治疗变化与1年后的治疗类似,但在第二年的AAP中,停止率明显降低。通过AAP的整体医疗成本均提高了GXR的处方成本较大的增加,导致两种治疗之间的医疗保健成本没有总体差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号