...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia >Impact of Oral Chlorhexidine on Bloodstream Infection in Critically Ill Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
【24h】

Impact of Oral Chlorhexidine on Bloodstream Infection in Critically Ill Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:口腔氯己定对患者血流感染的影响:系统综述和随机对照试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives Oropharyngeal overgrowth of microorganisms in the critically ill is a risk factor for lower respiratory tract infection and subsequent invasion of the bloodstream. Oral chlorhexidine has been used to prevent pneumonia, but its effect on bloodstream infection never has been assessed in meta-analyses. The authors explored the effect of oral chlorhexidine on the incidence of bloodstream infection, the causative microorganism, and on all-cause mortality in critically ill patients. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. Setting Intensive care unit. Participants The study comprised critically ill patients receiving oral chlorhexidine (test group) and placebo or standard oral care (control group). Interventions PubMed and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using the random-effects model. Measurements and Main Results Five studies including 1,655 patients (832 chlorhexidine and 823 control patients) were identified. The majority of information was from studies at low or unclear risk bias; 1 study was at high risk of bias. Bloodstream infection and mortality were not reduced significantly by chlorhexidine (OR 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-1.50 and OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.31-1.53, respectively). In the subgroup of surgical, mainly cardiac, patients, chlorhexidine reduced bloodstream infection (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.22-0.97). Chlorhexidine did not affect any microorganism significantly. Conclusion In critically ill patients, oropharyngeal chlorhexidine did not reduce bloodstream infection and mortality significantly and did not affect any microorganism involved. The presence of a high risk of bias in 1 study and unclear risk of bias in others may have affected the robustness of these findings.
机译:目的在危重病症中的微生物的目标口咽过度生长是降低呼吸道感染和随后血液侵袭的危险因素。口腔氯己定已被用于预防肺炎,但其对血流感染的影响从未在Meta-Analys中进行评估。作者探讨了口服氯己定对血流感染,致病微生物发病率以及危重病患者中的所有导致死亡率的影响。设计系统评价与发布研究的荟萃分析。设置重症监护手机。参与者该研究包括接受口腔氯己定(试验组)和安慰剂或标准口腔护理(对照组)的批判性患者。搜查了干预们和受控试验的Cochrane登记册。使用随机效应模型汇集了赔率比(或)。测量和主要结果五项研究,包括1,655名患者(832氯己定和823名控制患者)。大多数信息都来自低或不明朗的风险偏见; 1研究偏向的高风险。氯己定(或0.74; 95%置信区间[CI] 0.37-1.50和0.69; 95%CI 0.31-1.53​​)不会显着降低血流感染和死亡率。在外科手术,主要是心脏,患者,氯己定降低血流感染(或0.47; 95%CI 0.22-0.97)中。氯己定没有显着影响任何微生物。结论在危重病患者中,口咽氯己定未显着降低血流感染和死亡率,并没有影响任何涉及的微生物。在1个研究中存在高风险的偏见和其他人的偏倚风险不明确可能影响了这些发现的鲁棒性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号