首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiac failure >Association between Sacubitril/Valsartan Initiation and Health Status Outcomes inHeart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction:Findings from the CHAMP-HF Registry
【24h】

Association between Sacubitril/Valsartan Initiation and Health Status Outcomes inHeart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction:Findings from the CHAMP-HF Registry

机译:Sacubitril / Valsartan开始和健康状况与健康状况的关系反射失败,减少射入分数:CHAMP-HF注册处的调查结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundOptimizing patients’ health status is a primary goal for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The association of sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI) with patients’ health status in clinical practice has not been described. MethodsThe Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) was serially assessed in 3436 HFrEF patients from 140 US centers in the CHAMP-HF registry. At the time of ARNI initiation, patients were matched with 2 controls based on a time-dependent propensity score including clinical factors (6 sociodemographic, 25 clinical characteristics) and prior KCCQ-OS. Matching was further stratified by prior use of ACE/ARB therapy. Linear regression compared changes in KCCQ-OS, between patients who were versus were not initiated on an ARNI, with differences of +5, +10, and +20 points (moderate, large, and very large improvement, respectively). The proportion of matched ARNI and no-ARNI patients experiencing a large (≥ +10) or very large (≥ +20) health status improvement was determined. ResultsARNI was initiated in 365 patients matched with 730 no-ARNI patients (standardized differences <10% for all 31 characteristics; indicating good group comparability). Changes in KCCQ-OS, over a median (IQR) of 32 (26, 53) days, are shown in Figure. Mean improvement in KCCQ-OS was greater in ARNI patients (6.0±19 vs. 3.6±17, p=0.014), primarily driven by improvements in KCCQ-Symptom (5.1±21 vs. 1.6±21, p=0.007) and KCCQ-Quality of Life scores (7.5±24 vs. 4.1±24, p=0.021). The proportion of ARNI versus no-ARNI patients with a ≥ large improvement in KCCQ-OS were 34.3% vs. 28.3% and 21.4% vs. 12.5% had a very large improvement, suggesting NNTs of 16 and 11. ConclusionIn routine care, ARNI initiation was associated with rapid improvement in health status, with 1 in 11 patients experiencing a very large health status benefit compared with those not treated with an ARNI. These findings further support the use of ARNI to improve patients’ health status.
机译:背景优化患者的健康状况是心力衰竭患者的主要目标,并减少喷射分数(HFREF)。尚未描述萨法利亚尔/缬沙坦(ARNI)与患者健康状况的协会尚未描述。方法堪萨斯城心肌病问卷调查问卷 - 总结(KCCQ-OS)在3436名HFREF患者中,来自140名美国Champ-HF注册处的140名患者。在Arni开始时,患者基于时间依赖性倾向评分与2个对照相匹配,包括临床因素(6个社会阶段,25个临床特征)和先前的KCCQ-OS。通过先前使用ACE / ARB疗法进一步分层匹配。线性回归在KCCQ-OS中的相比变化,在arni上未启动的患者,+ 5,+10和+ 20分的差异(中等,大,并且非常大的改进)。确定了匹配的arni和arni患者的比例,体积大(≥+10)或非常大(≥+20)健康状况改进。结果在365名与730名无arni患者匹配的365名患者中启动了(所有31种特征的标准化差异<10%;表明良好的群体可比性)。 kccq-os的变化,在32(26,53)天中的中位数(IQR),如图所示。 ARNI患者的KCCQ-OS的平均改善(6.0±19±19±17,P = 0.014),主要由KCCQ症状的改进驱动(5.1±21对1.6±21,P = 0.007)和KCCQ寿命评分的质量(7.5±24与4.1±24,p = 0.021)。 ARNI与NO-ARNI患者的含量为≥KCCQ-OS的含量为34.3%,比例为28.3%和21.4%,对12.5%的改善具有很大的改善,表明NNT为16和11。结论结论常规护理,ARNI与健康状况的快速改善有关,患有1名患者的迅速改善有关,而且与未治疗ARNI治疗的人相比,患者具有非常大的健康状况。这些调查结果进一步支持ARNI的使用来改善患者的健康状况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号