...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Biomechanics >Position of the quadriceps actuator influences knee loads during simulated squat testing
【24h】

Position of the quadriceps actuator influences knee loads during simulated squat testing

机译:Quadriceps执行器的位置在模拟蹲接测试期间影响膝关节载荷

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The "Oxford Rig" cadaveric simulator permits researchers and clinicians to study knee mechanics during a simulated squatting motion. The motion of the lower limb in the Oxford Rig is typically controlled by a single actuator that applies tension to the quadriceps tendon. The location of the quadriceps actuator, however, has differed across published descriptions of the Oxford Rig. Actuators have been placed on the femur and pelvis, and on "grounded" locations external to the specimen, but the consequences of this placement for knee kinematics and kinetics are unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine these effects using a validated computational musculoskeletal model. When the actuator was placed on the femur or pelvis, forces realistically increased with knee flexion, with quadriceps and patellofemoral contact forces exceeding 2000 N and 3000 N, respectively, at 100 degrees flexion. When the actuator was grounded, however, forces were substantially reduced and did not monotonically increase with flexion. Articular joint contact forces were not strongly influenced by changing the location of the actuator from the femur to the pelvis, with small RMS differences in quadriceps forces (48.2 N), patellofemoral forces (83.6 N), and tibiofemoral forces (58.9 N) between these conditions. The location of the actuator did not substantially affect knee kinematics. The results of this study suggest that the quadriceps actuator of the Oxford Rig should be attached to either the femur or the pelvis when the goal is to make realistic estimates of quadriceps forces and articular contact forces within the knee joint. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:“牛津钻机”尸体模拟器允许研究人员和临床医生在模拟蹲运动期间研究膝关系。牛津钻机中的下肢的运动通常由单个致动器控制,该致动器将张力施加到QuadRiceps肌腱。然而,QuaddRiceps执行器的位置跨越牛津钻机的公布描述不同。已经放在股骨和骨盆上的执行器,并在标本外部的“接地”位置上,但这种安置膝关节运动学和动力学的后果是未知的。本研究的目的是使用经过验证的计算肌肉骨骼模型来检查这些效果。当致动器放置在股骨或骨盆上时,力在膝关节屈曲的情况下实际增加,分别以100度屈曲超过2000 n和3000 n的Quadriceps和Patellofemoral接触力。然而,当致动器接地时,力显着降低,并且在屈曲下没有单调增加。关节接触力不会强烈影响,通过将致动器从股骨到骨盆改变致动器的位置,Quadriceps力(48.2n),髌果蝇(83.6 n)和胫骨代理力(58.9n)之间具有小的均方根差异状况。执行器的位置基本上没有影响膝关节运动学。本研究的结果表明,当目标是在膝关节内的曲折型液体和关节接触力的现实估计时,牛津钻机的Quadriceps致动器应该附着在股骨或骨盆上。 (c)2018年elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号