首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied physiology >Habitual aerobic exercise does not protect against micro-or macrovascular endothelial dysfunction in healthy estrogen-deficient postmenopausal women
【24h】

Habitual aerobic exercise does not protect against micro-or macrovascular endothelial dysfunction in healthy estrogen-deficient postmenopausal women

机译:习惯性好氧运动不会在健康雌激素缺乏绝经后妇女身上防止微血管内皮功能障碍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aging causes micro-and macrovascular endothelial dysfunction, as assessed by endothelium-dependent dilation (EDD), which can be prevented and reversed by habitual aerobic exercise (AE) in men. However, in estrogen-deficient postmenopausal women, whole forearm microvascular EDD has not been studied, and a beneficial effect of AE on macrovascular EDD has not been consistently shown. We assessed forearm blood flow in response to brachial artery infusions of acetylcholine (FBFACh), a measure of whole forearm microvascular EDD, and brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), a measure of macrovascular EDD, in 12 premenopausal sedentary women (Pre-S; 24 +/- 1 yr; (V) over dot(O2max)= 37.5 +/- 1.6 ml.kg (-1).min(-1)), 25 estrogen-deficient postmenopausal sedentary women (Post-S; 62 +/- 1 yr; (V) over dot(O2max) +/- 24.7 +/- 0.9 ml.kg(-1).min(-1)), and 16 estrogen-deficient postmenopausal AE-trained women (Post-AE; 59 +/- 1 yr; (V) over dot(O2max) +/- 40.4 +/- 1.4 ml.kg(-1)min(-1)). FBFACh was lower in Post-S and Post-AE compared with Pre-S women (135 +/- 9 and 116 +/- 17 vs. 193 +/- 21 AUC, respectively, both P < 0.008), whereas Post-S and Post-AE women were not different (P = 0.3). Brachial artery FMD was 34% (5.73 +/- 0.67%) and 45% (4.79 +/- 0.57%) lower in Post-S and Post-AE, respectively, vs. Pre-S women (8.69 +/- 0.95%, both P <= 0.01), but not different between Post-S and Post-AE women (P = 0.3). Post-AE women had lower circulating C-reactive protein and oxidized low-density lipoprotein compared with Post-S women (0.5 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.2 mg/l and 40 +/- 4 vs. 55 +/- 3 U/l, respectively, both P = 0.01), but these markers were not correlated to FBFACh (P = 0.3) or brachial artery FMD (P = 0.8). These findings are consistent with the idea that habitual AE does not protect against age/menopause-related whole forearm micro-and macrovascular endothelial dysfunction in healthy nonobese estrogen-deficient postmenopausal women, despite being associated with lower systemic markers of inflammation and oxidative stress.
机译:老化导致微生物血管内皮功能障碍,如依赖于内皮依赖性扩张(EDD)的评估,这可以通过男性习惯性好氧运动(AE)预防和逆转。然而,在雌激素缺乏绝经后妇女中,尚未研究整个前臂微血管EDD,并且尚未持续显示AE对大血管EDD的有益作用。我们评估了前臂血流响应乙酰胆碱(FBFACH)的肱动脉输注,一定数量的整个前臂微血管EDD,以及肱动脉流动介导的扩张(FMD),致癌血管EDD的量度,在12位前肢久坐妇女(预先) S; 24 +/- 1 Yr;(v)ovet(o2max)= 37.5 +/- 1.6 ml.kg(-1).min(-1)),25例雌激素绝经后久坐妇女(后S; 62 +/- 1 Yr;(v)ovet(o2max)+/- 24.7 +/- 0.9 ml.kg(-1).min(-1))和16个雌激素缺乏绝经后培训的女性(帖子-AE; 59 +/- 1 Yr;(v)ovot(o2max)+/- 40.4 +/- 1.4 ml.kg(-1)min(-1))。 Post-S和AE后的FBFACH与Pre-S女性(135 +/- 9和116 +/-17分别为193 +/- 21 AUC,P <0.008),而POST-S后AE妇女没有不同(p = 0.3)。肱动脉FMD分别为34%(5.73 +/- 0.67%),分别为5.7%(4.79 +/- 0.57%),分别为5.6%的女性(8.69 +/- 0.95%) ,P <= 0.01),但后面的妇女和患者女性之间不含量(P = 0.3)。与后女性相比,AE后妇女的循环C反应蛋白和氧化低密度脂蛋白(0.5 +/- 0.1,1.1 +/- 0.2 mg / L和40 +/- 4与55 + / - 3 U / L分别,P = 0.01),但这些标志物与FBFACH(P = 0.3)或臂动脉FMD(P = 0.8)无关。这些发现与习惯性AE不保护患者/更年期相关的全前臂微生物和大血管内皮功能障碍,尽管与炎症和氧化应激的较低的全身标记相关,但习惯性AE不会防止健康的非食雌激素缺乏绝经后妇女的微血管内皮功能障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号