...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal for the scientific study of religion >The Nature-Nurture Debate Is Over, and Both Sides Lost! Implications for Understanding Gender Differences in Religiosity
【24h】

The Nature-Nurture Debate Is Over, and Both Sides Lost! Implications for Understanding Gender Differences in Religiosity

机译:自然培育辩论结束了,双方都丢失了! 对理解宗教性别差异的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the debate about biological dispositions or differential sex-role socialization, too much emphasis is given to an either- or dichotomy. We argue that the higher religiosity of women is likely the product of both biological and environmental influences by discussing: (1) the fallacy of nature "versus" nurture; (2) biological influences on religious outcomes; (3) biological influences on the predictors of religious involvement; (4) causality and confounding in social science; and (5) interdisciplinary models of biology-environment interplay.
机译:在关于生物分化或差异性角色社会化的辩论中,给予了两种或二分法的重点。 我们认为,妇女的更高宗教性可能是通过讨论生物和环境影响的产品:(1)自然谬误“与”培育; (2)对宗教结果的生物影响; (3)对宗教参与预测的生物影响; (4)社会科学的因果关系和混淆; (5)生物环境相互作用的跨学科模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号