...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of abnormal psychology >Mood Reactivity and Affective Dynamics in Mood and Anxiety Disorders
【24h】

Mood Reactivity and Affective Dynamics in Mood and Anxiety Disorders

机译:情绪反应性和情绪和焦虑障碍的情感动态

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The application of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in community settings provides a powerful opportunity to obtain measures of emotional reactivity to daily life events, as well as emotional dynamics in real time. This investigation examines the association between emotional reactivity to daily events and emotional experience in mood and anxiety disorders in a large community-based sample. Two-hundred and 87 participants with a lifetime history of bipolar I disorder (BPI; n = 33), bipolar II disorder (BPII; n = 37), major depression (MDD; n = 116), anxiety disorders without a mood disorder (ANX; n = 36), and controls without a lifetime history of mood, anxiety, or substance use disorder (n = 65) completed a 2-week EMA evaluation period concerning mood states and daily events. Following positive events, individuals with BPI reported greater decreases in both sad and anxious mood than did controls, and individuals with MDD experienced greater decreases in anxious mood. Following negative events, the BPII, MDD, and ANX (but not BPI) groups experienced greater increases in anxious mood, with no group differences in sad mood. Greater variability and instability were observed for sad mood in the BPII and MDD groups, and greater variability and instability was observed for anxious mood in all of the mood/anxiety groups. However, no group differences were observed for the inertia of sad or anxious moods. The findings demonstrate differences in emotional reactivity to daily events as well as the general affective dynamics of emotional states among individuals with mood or anxiety disorders, with potential specificity for BPI disorder relative to other disorders. Emotional variability and instability may constitute a nonspecific characteristic of both mood and anxiety disorders.
机译:生态瞬间评估(EMA)在社区环境中的应用提供了一种强大的机会,可以在日常生活事件中获得情绪反应性的措施,以及实时情绪动态。本调查审查了在基于大型社区样本中的情绪和焦虑症的日常事件和情绪障碍的情绪和情感经验之间的关联。两百和87名参与者具有双极I紊乱的寿命历史(BPI; n = 33),双极II疾病(BPII; n = 37),重大抑郁(MDD; n = 116),焦虑症没有情绪障碍(焦虑; n = 36),无需终身情绪,焦虑或物质使用障碍(n = 65)的控制完成了有关情绪状态和日常事件的2周EMA评估期。在积极的事件之后,BPI的个人报告悲伤和焦虑的心情减少,而不是控制,MDD的个人在焦虑的心情下降得多。在负面事件之后,BPII,MDD和ANX(但不是BPI)组经历了焦虑的增加,没有群体情绪差异。在BPII和MDD组中观察到悲伤情绪的悲伤情绪更大的可变性和不稳定性,并且在所有情绪/焦虑团体中担心焦虑的情绪更加可变性和不稳定性。然而,对于悲伤或焦虑的惯性,没有观察到群体差异。该研究结果表明,情绪或焦虑障碍的个体情绪状态的情绪反应性的情绪反应性的差异,具有与其他疾病相对于其他障碍的潜在特异性。情绪变异性和不稳定性可能构成情绪和焦虑症的非特异性特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号