...
首页> 外文期刊>Developing world bioethics >Ethical Challenges that Arise at the Community Interface of Health Research: Village Reporters' Experiences in Western Kenya
【24h】

Ethical Challenges that Arise at the Community Interface of Health Research: Village Reporters' Experiences in Western Kenya

机译:健康研究社区界面出现的道德挑战:肯尼亚西部村委会的经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Community Engagement (CE) has been presented by bio-ethicists and scientists as a straightforward and unequivocal good which can minimize the risks of exploitation and ensure a fair distribution of research benefits in developing countries. By means of ethnographic fieldwork undertaken in Kenya between 2007 and 2009 we explored how CE is understood and enacted in paediatric vaccine trials conducted by the Kenyan Medical Research Institute and the US Centers for Disease Control (KEMRI/CDC). In this paper we focus on the role of paid volunteers who act as an interface between villagers KEMRI/CDC. Village Reporters' (VRs) position of being both with the community and with KEMRI/CDC is advantageous for the conduct of trials. However it is also problematic in terms of exercising trust, balancing allegiances and representing community views. VRs role is shaped by ambiguities related to their employment status and their dual accountability to researchers and their villages. VRs are understandably careful to stress their commitment to self-less community service since it augments their respectability at community level and opens up opportunities for financial gain and self-development. Simultaneously VRs association with KEMRI/CDC and proximity to trial participants requires them to negotiate implicit and explicit expectations for material and medical assistance in a cultural setting in which much importance is placed on sharing and mutuality. To ensure continuity of productive interactions between VRs, and similar community intermediaries, and researchers, open discussion is needed about the problematic aspects of relational ethics, issues concerning undue influence, power relations and negotiating expectations.
机译:社区参与(CE)已被生物伦理学家和科学家介绍,作为直截了当和明确的益处,可以最大限度地降低开发风险,并确保发展中国家的研究效益公平分配。通过2007年至2009年肯尼亚在肯尼亚开展的民族造型实践,我们探讨了肯亚医学研究所和美国疾病控制中心(Kemri / CDC)进行的儿科疫苗试验中的如何理解和颁布了CE。在本文中,我们专注于起薪志愿者作为村民Kemri / CDC之间的界面的作用。与社区和Kemri / CDC一起的村报告人(VRS)的立场是有利于进行试验的有利。然而,就行使信托,平衡且代表社区观点而言也是有问题的。 VRS角色由与其就业状况及其对研究人员及其村庄的双重责任有关的含糊不清的塑造。 VRS认识地仔细地强调他们对自更卖社区服务的承诺,因为它增强了社区一级的尊重,并为财务收益和自我发展开辟了机会。与Kemri / CDC的同时,与试验参与者的近距离联系要求他们在文化环境中谈判对材料和医疗援助的隐性和明确的预期,其中重视分享和相互作用。为确保VRS和类似社区中介机构和研究人员之间的高效互动的连续性,需要开放的讨论,了解关系伦理的问题方面,有关不当影响,权力关系和谈判期望的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号