A Quantitative Comparison of Noise Reduction Across Five Commercial (Hybrid and ModelBased) Iterative Reconstruction Techniques: An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study

摘要

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to compare the performance of three hybrid iterative reconstruction techniques (IRTs) (ASiR, iDose4, SAFIRE) and their respective strengths for image noise reduction on low-dose CT examinations using filtered back projection (FBP) as the standard reference. Also, we compared the performance of these three hybrid IRTs with two model-based IRTs (Veo and IMR) for image noise reduction on low-dose examinations.