首页> 外文期刊>Human movement science >Kinematic patterns underlying disguised movements: Spatial and temporal dissimilarity compared to genuine movement patterns
【24h】

Kinematic patterns underlying disguised movements: Spatial and temporal dissimilarity compared to genuine movement patterns

机译:伪装动作的运动模式:与真正运动模式相比,空间和时间不一致

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Highlights ? This study investigated the kinematic characteristics of disguised movements. ? Linear discriminability between disguised and non-disguised movements was more error-prone for the temporal in comparison to the spatial component. ? The spatial dissimilarities were higher for novices in comparison to experts. ? Highest spatial dissimilarities were found in end effector-specific and -unspecific body parts. ? Expertise in performing disguised movements depends mainly on keeping spatial dissimilarities as small as possible. Abstract This study examined the kinematic characteristics of disguised movements by applying linear discriminant (LDA) and dissimilarity analyses to the motion data from 788 disguised and 792 non-disguised 7-m penalty throws performed by novice and expert handball field players. Results of the LDA showed that discrimination between type of throws (disguised vs. non-disguised) was more error-prone when throws were performed by experts (spatial: 4.6%; temporal: 29.6%) compared to novices (spatial: 1.0%; temporal: 20.2%). The dissimilarity analysis revealed significantly smaller spatial dissimilarities and variations between type of throws in experts compared to novices ( p 0.001), but also showed that these spatial dissimilarities and variations increased significantly in both groups the closer the throws came to the moment of (predicted) ball release. In contrast, temporal dissimilarities did not differ significantly between groups. Thus, our data clearly demonstrate that expertise in disguising one’s own action intentions results in an ability to perform disguised penalty throws that are highly similar to genuine throws. We suggest that this expertise depends mainly on keeping spatial dissimilarities small. However, the attempt to disguise becomes a challenge the closer one gets to the action outcome (i.e., ball release) becoming visible. ]]>
机译:强调 ?本研究调查了伪装运动的运动学特征。还与空间组分相比,伪装和非伪装运动之间的线性辨别性更容易出错的时间。还与专家相比,新手的空间异化较高。还在最终效应子特异性和单独的身体部位中发现了最高的空间异化。还执行伪装运动的专业知识主要取决于保持尽可能小的空间异化。摘要本研究检测了通过施加线性判别(LDA)的伪装运动的运动特性,并从新手和专家手球野外参与者执行的788伪装和792个非伪装的7-M罚款投掷。 LDA的结果表明,当专家执行投掷时(空间:4.6%;时间:29.6%),投掷类型(伪装与非伪装)之间的歧视更容易出错(29.6%)(空间:1.0%;颞:20.2%)。不相似性分析显示出专家投掷类型之间的空间差异和变化与新纤维相比(P <0.001),但也表明,这些空间异常和变化在两个群体中显着增加,越小的投掷来到(预测)球释放。相比之下,组之间的时间异化并没有显着差异。因此,我们的数据清楚地表明,伪造自己的行动意图的专业知识导致能够执行与真正投掷高度相似的伪装罚款投掷。我们建议,这种专业知识主要取决于保持空间异化小。然而,伪装的尝试成为一个挑战,更近的是一个越手进入动作结果(即球释放)变得可见。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号