...
首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >Do prospective payment systems (PPSs) lead to desirable providers’ incentives and patients’ outcomes? A systematic review of evidence from developing countries
【24h】

Do prospective payment systems (PPSs) lead to desirable providers’ incentives and patients’ outcomes? A systematic review of evidence from developing countries

机译:预期支付系统(PPSS)是否导致理想的提供商的激励和患者的结果? 系统审查来自发展中国家的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The reform of provider payment systems, from retrospective to prospective payment, has been heralded as the right move to contain costs in the light of rising health expenditures in many countries. However, there are concerns on quality trade-off. The heightened attention given to prospective payment system (PPS) reforms and the rise of empirical evidence regarding PPS interventions among developing countries suggest that a systematic review is necessary to understand the effects of PPS reforms in developing countries. A systematic search of 14 databases and a hand search of health policy journals and grey literature from October to November 2016 were carried out, guided by a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted based on the Consolidated Health Economics Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist. Drummond’s 10-item checklist for economic evaluation, Cochrane Collaboration’s tool in assessing risk of bias for randomized trials, and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions were used to critically appraise the evidence. A total of 12 studies reported in China, Thailand and Vietnam were included in this review. Substantial heterogeneity was present in PPS policy design across different localities. PPS interventions were found to have reduced health expenditures on both the supply and demand side, as well as length of stay and readmission rates. In addition, PPS generally improved service quality outcomes by reducing the likelihood or percentage of physicians prescribing unnecessary drugs and diagnostic procedures. PPS is a promising policy tool for middle-income countries to achieve reasonable health policy objectives in terms of cost containment without necessarily compromising the quality of care. More evaluations of PPS will need to be conducted in the future in order to broaden the evidence base beyond middle-income countries.
机译:提供者支付系统的改革,从回顾到潜在支付,已将其提高到许多国家的保健支出上升的成本。但是,质量权衡有担忧。对前瞻性支付制度(PPS)改革的提高和有关发展中国家PPS干预的经验证据的兴起表明,有必要制定系统审查,以了解发展中国家PPS改革的影响。从10月到2016年10月到2016年10月到2016年10月的健康政策期刊和灰色文学的系统搜索,以一套包含和排除标准为指导。基于综合健康经济学评估报告标准清单提取数据。 Drummond的10项清单进行经济评估,Cochrane协作在评估随机试验偏见风险方面的工具,并用于干预措施的非随机研究中的偏差风险批判性地评估证据。在中国,泰国和越南报道了12项研究被列入了本综述。在不同地区的PPS策略设计中存在实质性异质性。发现PPS干预措施在供需方面减少了卫生支出,以及留宿时间和入院率。此外,PPS通常通过降低规定不必要的药物和诊断程序的医生的可能性或百分比来改善服务质量结果。 PPS是中等收入国家的有希望的政策工具,以实现成本遏制的合理健康政策目标,而不必损害护理质量。需要在将来进行更多的PPS评估,以扩大中等收入国家的证据基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号