首页> 外文期刊>Heart and vessels: An international journal >Prognostic role of a new risk index for the prediction of 30-day cardiovascular mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: the Age-Mean Arterial Pressure Index (AMAPI)
【24h】

Prognostic role of a new risk index for the prediction of 30-day cardiovascular mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: the Age-Mean Arterial Pressure Index (AMAPI)

机译:急性肺栓塞患者预测30天心血管死亡率的新风险指标的预后作用:年龄平均动脉压指数(AMAPI)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third cause of cardiovascular (CV) mortality. We evaluated a new risk index, named Age-Mean Arterial Pressure Index (AMAPI), to predict 30-day CV mortality in patients with acute PE. Data of 209 patients (44.0% male and 56.0% female, mean age 70.58?±?14.14?years) with confirmed acute PE were retrospectively analysed. AMAPI was calculated as the ratio between age and mean arterial pressure (MAP), which was defined as [systolic blood pressure?+?(2?×?diastolic blood pressure)]/3. To test AMAPI accuracy, a comparison with shock index (SI) and simplified pulmonary embolism severity index (sPESI) was performed. Patients were divided in two groups according their hemodynamic stability, or not, at admission. 30-day mortality rate, in all cases for CV events, was 10.5% ( n ?=?22). Hemodynamically unstable patients had a higher AMAPI compare to those without hypotension at admission (1.28?±?0.39 vs 0.78?±?0.27, p ? p ?=?0.0006 and 11.5%, p ?=?0.0002, respectively). In hemodynamically unstable patients NRI was 19.2%, p ?=?0.006. Mantel–Cox analysis revealed a statistical significant difference in the distribution of survival between hemodynamically stable patients with an AMAPI index ≥0.9 compared to those with an AMAPI p ? p ?=?0.001]. AMAPI ≥0.90 and ≥0.92 predict 30-day CV mortality in hemodynamically stable and unstable patients with acute PE.
机译:摘要急性肺栓塞(PE)是心血管(CV)死亡率的第三个原因。我们评估了新的风险指数,称为年龄平均动脉压力指数(AMAPI),以预测急性PE患者的30天CV死亡率。回顾性分析了209名患者的209名患者(男性和56.0%的女性和56.0%,平均值70.58岁)。 AMAPI被计算为年龄和平均动脉压(MAP)之间的比率,其定义为[收缩压吗?+?(2?×舒张压血压)] / 3。为了测试AMAPI精度,进行与冲击指数(SI)和简化肺栓塞严重性指数(SPESI)的比较。患者分为两组,根据其血液动力学稳定性,在入院时。在所有情况下,30天死亡率,在所有情况下为CV事件,为10.5%(n?=?22)。血流动力学不稳定的患者与入院时没有低血压的患者更高的AMAPI(1.28?±0.39 Vs 0.78?±0.27,P?p?= 0.0006和11.5%,P?= 0.0002分别)。在血流动力学不稳定的患者中,NRI是19.2%,p?= 0.006。 Mantel-Cox分析显示血流动力学稳定患者在AMAPI指数≥0.9的血流动力学稳定患者之间存活分布的统计学差异≥0.9与amapi p的患者相比? p?= 0.001]。 AMAPI≥0.90和≥0.92预测血流动力学稳定和不稳定患者的30天CV死亡率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号