首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Difference between clinical and pathologic renal tumor size, correlation with survival, and implications for patient counseling regarding nephron-sparing surgery.
【24h】

Difference between clinical and pathologic renal tumor size, correlation with survival, and implications for patient counseling regarding nephron-sparing surgery.

机译:临床和病理性肾脏肿瘤大小之间的差异,与生存的相关性以及对保留肾单位的患者咨询的意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the difference between clinical tumor size and pathologic tumor size and the influence of both parameters on cancer-specific survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical tumor size was measured by CT in 834 patients undergoing nephrectomy and was compared with pathologic tumor size. Clinical tumor size and clinical tumor stages were assessed in a central radiologic review. Several variables were analyzed regarding their impact on cancer-specific survival by use of the Kaplan-Meier method, multivariable Cox regression, and receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up for patients who were alive at the end of the study (n = 564) was 85 months. The mean clinical and pathologic tumor size was 5.93 and 5.53 cm, respectively (p = 0.005). Of 265 patients with cT1a tumors, only 3.0% (n = 8) had pathologic tumor stage pT3a or higher. In contrast, 15.2% of 317 patients with cT1b tumors had pathologic tumor stage pT2 or higher. Five-year cancer-specific survival according to clinical tumor size was 94% ( 7 cm), respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis revealed that metastasis, sex, age, and clinical tumor size significantly influenced cancer-specific survival. Integration of pathologic tumor size instead of clinical tumor size into multivariable analysis resulted in a reduction of predictive accuracy of 2.3%. CONCLUSION: CT significantly overestimated tumor size in the overall study group, but this overestimation is unlikely to be of clinical importance regarding the decision about radical versus nephron-sparing surgery. However, clinical understaging in 15% of cT1b tumors should be considered in treatment decision making. Clinical tumor size had an independent impact on cancer-specific survival and revealed a higher prognostic value compared with pathologic tumor size.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估临床肿瘤大小和病理肿瘤大小之间的差异,以及这两个参数对肾细胞癌患者癌症特异性生存的影响。材料与方法:对834例行肾切除术的患者进行CT测量,并将其与病理性肿瘤大小进行比较。在中央放射学评估中评估了临床肿瘤大小和临床肿瘤分期。通过使用Kaplan-Meier方法,多变量Cox回归和受试者工作特征分析,分析了几个变量对它们对癌症特异性存活的影响。结果:研究结束时(n = 564)存活的患者的平均随访时间为85个月。临床和病理平均肿瘤大小分别为5.93 cm和5.53 cm(p = 0.005)。在265例患有cT1a肿瘤的患者中,只有3.0%(n = 8)具有病理性肿瘤分期pT3a或更高。相比之下,在317例cT1b肿瘤患者中,有15.2%处于病理性肿瘤分期pT2或更高。根据临床肿瘤大小的五年特异性癌症生存率分别为94%( 7 cm)(p <0.001)。多变量回归分析显示,转移,性别,年龄和临床肿瘤大小显着影响特定于癌症的存活率。将病理肿瘤的大小而非临床肿瘤的大小整合到多变量分析中会导致预测准确性降低2.3%。结论:在整个研究组中,CT明显高估了肿瘤的大小,但就根治性手术还是保留肾单位的手术而言,这种高估不太可能具有临床意义。然而,在治疗决策中应考虑对15%的cT1b肿瘤进行临床分期。与病理性肿瘤大小相比,临床肿瘤大小对癌症特异性存活率具有独立影响,并且显示出更高的预后价值。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号