Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis

Geraghty Robert M.; Jones Patrick; Herrmann Thomas R. W.; Aboumarzouk Omar; Somani Bhaskar K.

首页> 外文期刊>World journal of urology >Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis

【24h】

Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis

机译：输尿管镜比石材处理的冲击波碎石术更具成本效益：系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Introduction A rising incidence of kidney stone disease has led to an increase in ureteroscopy (URS) and shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). Our aim was to compare the cost of URS and SWL for treatment of stones.

机译：引言肾脏石疾病的升高发病率导致输尿管镜（URS）和冲击波碎石（SWL）的增加。我们的目标是比较URS和SWL的成本来治疗石头。

著录项

来源
《World journal of urology》 |2018年第11期|共11页
作者
Geraghty Robert M.; Jones Patrick; Herrmann Thomas R. W.; Aboumarzouk Omar; Somani Bhaskar K.;
展开▼
作者单位

Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Trust Dept Urol Southampton SO16 6YD Hants England;

Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Trust Dept Urol Southampton SO16 6YD Hants England;

Spital Thurgau AG Urol Clin Frauenfeld Switzerland;

Queen Elizabeth Univ Hosp Dept Urol Glasgow Lanark Scotland;

Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Trust Dept Urol Southampton SO16 6YD Hants England;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类泌尿科学（泌尿生殖系疾病）;
关键词
Ureteroscopy; Shock wave lithotripsy; Cost; Effectiveness; Outcomes;

机译：输尿管镜;冲击波碎石术;成本;有效性;结果;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis [J] . Geraghty Robert M., Jones Patrick, Herrmann Thomas R. W., World journal of urology . 2018,第11期

机译：输尿管镜比石材处理的冲击波碎石术更具成本效益：系统评价和荟萃分析
2. A Trade-off Between Invasiveness and Efficacy: Ureteroscopy vs Shock Wave Lithotripsy Commentary on: Comparative effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treating patients with kidney stones [J] . Shakeri Aria, Van Asseldonk Brandon, Elterman Dean S. Urology . 2015,第5期

机译：侵袭性和功效之间的权衡：输尿管镜与冲击波碎石术的评论：冲击波碎石术和输尿管镜治疗肾结石患者的比较效果
3. The Efficacy of Medical Expulsive Therapy (MET) in Improving Stone-free Rate and Stone Expulsion Time, After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J] . Skolarikos Andreas, Grivas Nikolaos, Kallidonis Panagiotis, Urology . 2015,第6期

机译：体外冲击波碎石术（SWL）治疗上尿路结石后，药物排除疗法（MET）改善无结石率和排石时间的功效：系统评价和荟萃分析
4. Ureteroscopy Holmium Laser Lithotripsy Treatment Complicated Ureteral Stones [C] . Fan-ping MENG, Jun WEI, Yong-liang CUI, International Conference on Biomedical and Biological Engineering . 2017

机译：输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗复杂的输尿管石
5. The Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Comparison to Low-Level Laser Therapy for Decreasing Pain and Symptom Severity and Increasing Functional Status in Adult Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [D] . Seely, Andrew. 2021

机译：体外冲击波治疗与低水平激光治疗对脑隧道综合征的成人患者疼痛和症状严重程度及函数状况的疗效：系统评价与荟萃分析
6. Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis [O] . Robert M. Geraghty, Patrick Jones, Thomas R. W. Herrmann, -1

机译：输尿管镜检查比冲击波碎石术更具成本效益：系统评价和荟萃分析
7. Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis [O] . Robert M. Geraghty, Patrick Jones, Thomas R. W. Herrmann, 2018

机译：输尿管镜检查比Shock Wave Lithotrips更具成本效益，用于石材处理：系统审查和META分析

Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅