...
首页> 外文期刊>Vegetation History and Archaeobotany >Cannabis utilization and diffusion patterns in prehistoric Europe: a critical analysis of archaeological evidence
【24h】

Cannabis utilization and diffusion patterns in prehistoric Europe: a critical analysis of archaeological evidence

机译:史前欧洲的大麻利用和扩散模式:考古证据的关键分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Archaeological evidence of Cannabis sativa is comprised of textiles, cordage, fibre and seeds, or pottery impressions of those materials, as well as pseudoliths and phytoliths (pollen is not addressed here). Previous summaries of this evidence connect hemp with Bronze and Iron Age cultures in Europe. This study improves upon earlier summaries by: (1) accessing a larger database; (2) relying on original studies instead of secondary sources; (3) stratifying evidence by its relative robustness or validity. We coupled digital text-searching engines with internet archives of machine-readable texts, augmented by citation tracking of retrieved articles. The database was large, so we limited retrieval to studies that predated 27 bce for west-central Europe, and pre-ce 400 for eastern Europe. Validity of evidence was scaled, from less robust (e.g., pottery impressions of fibre) to more robust (e.g. microscopic analysis of seeds). Archaeological sites were mapped using ArcGIS 10.3. The search retrieved 136 studies, a yield four-fold greater than previous summaries when parsed to our geographic/time constraints. Only 12.5% of studies came from secondary literature. No robust evidence supports claims of Neolithic hemp usage. One Copper Age site in southeastern Europe shows robust evidence (from the GumelniA a-Varna pound culture). More robust evidence appears during the Bronze Age in southeastern Europe (Yamnaya and Catacomb cultures). An Iron Age steppe culture, the Scythians, likely introduced hemp cultivation to Celtic, Slavic and Finno-Ugric cultures. The results correlate with a recent palynology study of fossil pollen in Europe. We discuss possible autochthonous domestication of Cannabis in Europe.
机译:大麻苜蓿的考古证据包括纺织品,绳索,纤维和种子,或这些材料的陶器印象,以及伪溶血和植物植物(Pollen未解决)。本证据的先前摘要将大麻与欧洲的青铜和铁时代文化联系在一起。本研究提高了以下摘要:(1)访问更大的数据库; (2)依靠原始研究而不是二级来源; (3)通过其相对稳健性或有效性分层证据。我们将数字文本搜索引擎耦合,通过Internet archives的机器可读文本,通过引文跟踪检索到的文章来增强。数据库很大,因此我们有限于检索到欧洲西部欧洲西部27 BCE的研究有限,以及东欧的CE 400。证据的有效性缩放,从较稳健的(例如,纤维的陶器印象)到更强大的(例如,种子的微观分析)。使用ArcGIS 10.3映射考古站点。搜索检索到136项研究,在对我们的地理/时间约束中解析时,比以前的摘要大的产量四倍。只有12.5%的研究来自二级文献。没有强大的证据支持新石器时代使用的索赔。东南欧的一个铜龄地位显示出稳健的证据(来自Gumelnia A-varna庞培)。在东南欧(Yamnaya和Catacomb文化)的青铜时代期间出现了更强大的证据。铁器时代草原文化,斯科特人,可能向凯尔特,斯拉夫和芬诺 - 无情的文化引入了大麻培养。结果与欧洲化石花粉的最近腭学研究相关联。我们讨论了欧洲大麻可能的自动紧张驯化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号