首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Genes >Evidence for Early European Neolithic Dog Dispersal: New Data on Southeastern European Subfossil Dogs from the Prehistoric and Antiquity Ages
【2h】

Evidence for Early European Neolithic Dog Dispersal: New Data on Southeastern European Subfossil Dogs from the Prehistoric and Antiquity Ages

机译:欧洲新石器时代犬早期传播的证据:史前和上古时期欧洲东南亚化石犬的新数据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The history of dog domestication is still under debate, but it is doubtless the process of an ancient partnership between dogs ( ) and humans. Although data on ancient DNA for dog diversity are still incomplete, it is clear that several regional dog populations had formed in Eurasia up to the Holocene. During the Neolithic Revolution and the transition from hunter-gatherer to farmer societies, followed by civilization changes in the Antiquity period, the dog population structure also changed. This process was due to replacement with newly formed dog populations. In this study, we present for the first time mitochondrial data of ancient dog remains from the Early Neolithic (8000 years before present (BP)) to Late Antiquity (up to 3th century AD) from southeastern Europe (the Balkans). A total of 16 samples were analyzed, using the mitochondrial D-loop region (HVR1). The results show the presence of A (70%) and B (25%) clades throughout the Early and Late Neolithic Period. In order to clarify the position of our results within the ancient dog population in Eneolithic Eurasia, we performed phylogenetic analysis with the available genetic data sets. This data showed a similarity of the ancient Bulgarian dogs to Italian (A, B, and C clades) and Iberian (clades A and C) dogs’ populations. A clear border can be seen between southern European genetic dog structure, on the one hand, and on the other hand, central-western (clade C), eastern (clade D) and northern Europe (clades A and C). This corresponds to genetic data for European humans during the same period, without admixture between dog populations. Also, our data have shown the presence of clade B in ancient Eurasia. This is not unexpected, as the B haplogroup is widely distributed in extant Balkan dogs and wolves. The presence of this clade both in dogs and in wolves on the Balkans may be explained with hybridization events before the Neolithic period. The spreading of this clade across Europe, together with the A clade, is related to the possible dissemination of newly formed dog breeds from Ancient Greece, Thrace, and the Roman Empire.
机译:狗的驯化历史仍在争论中,但这无疑是狗与人之间古老的伙伴关系的过程。尽管有关犬类多样性的古代DNA的数据仍然不完整,但很明显,直到全新世为止,在欧亚大陆已经形成了几个区域犬类种群。在新石器时代革命和从猎人-采集者到农民社会的过渡期间,随着古代文明的变化,狗的种群结构也发生了变化。这个过程是由于用新形成的狗种群替代。在这项研究中,我们首次展示了东南欧(巴尔干半岛)从新石器时代早期(今古前8000年)到古代晚期(直至公元3世纪)古犬遗迹的线粒体数据。使用线粒体D环区域(HVR1)分析了总共16个样品。结果表明,在新石器时代早期和晚期都存在A(70%)和B(25%)进化枝。为了阐明我们的研究结果在Eneolithic欧亚大陆古代狗种群中的地位,我们利用可用的遗传数据集进行了系统发育分析。该数据表明,古代保加利亚犬与意大利犬(A,B和C进化枝)和伊比利亚犬(A和C进化枝)的种群相似。一方面,在欧洲南部的遗传犬结构之间可以看到清晰的边界,另一方面,在中西部(C类),东部(D类)和北欧(A和C类)之间。这与同期欧洲人的遗传数据相对应,没有狗种群之间的混合。同样,我们的数据显示出古代欧亚大陆中存在进化枝B。这并不意外,因为B单倍群广泛分布于现存的巴尔干犬和狼中。巴尔干半岛上的犬和狼中都存在这种进化枝,这可以通过新石器时代之前的杂交事件来解释。该进化枝与A进化枝一起在欧洲传播,与可能传播来自古希腊,色雷斯和罗马帝国的新品种犬种有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号