首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >Comparative Effectiveness of Computed Tomography-Versus Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation Among Medicare Patients 65 Years of Age or Older With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
【24h】

Comparative Effectiveness of Computed Tomography-Versus Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation Among Medicare Patients 65 Years of Age or Older With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

机译:在肝细胞癌65岁或以上的Medicare患者中,计算断层扫描的比较有效性 - 与超声波引导的经皮射频消融患者肝细胞癌65岁或以上

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not eligible for surgical resection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a promising technique that reduces the risk of disease progression. Objectives: To evaluate whether the trend of image guidance for RFA is moving toward the more expensive computed tomography (CT) technology and to determine the clinical benefits of CT guidance over the ultrasound (US) guidance. Methods: A cohort of 463 patients was identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare-linked database. The temporal trends in use of image guidance were assessed using the Cochrane-Armitage test. The associations between modality of image guidance and survival, complications, and costs were assessed using the Cox regression model, the logistic regression model, and the generalized linear model, respectively. Results: The use of CT-guided RFA increased sharply, from 20.7% in 2002 to 75.9% in 2011. Compared with CT-guided RFA, those who received US-guided RFA had comparable risk of periprocedural and delayed postprocedural complications. Stratified analyses by tumor size also showed no statistically significant difference. In adjusted survival analysis, no statistically significant difference was observed in overall and cancer-specific survival. Nevertheless, the cost of CT-guided RFA ($2847) was higher than that of US-guided RFA ($1862). Conclusions: Despite its rapid adoption over time, CT-guided RFA incurred higher procedural costs than US-guided RFA but did not significantly improve postprocedural complications and survival. Echoing the American Board of Internal Medicine's Choosing Wisely campaign and the American Society of Clinical Oncology's Value of Cancer Care initiative, findings from our study call for critical evaluation of whether CT-guided RFA provides high-value care for patients with HCC.
机译:背景:对于患有肝细胞癌(HCC)的患者没有资格进行手术切除,射频消融(RFA)是一种有希望的技术,可降低疾病进展的风险。目的:评估RFA的图像指导趋势是否正在朝着更昂贵的计算机断层扫描(CT)技术,并确定CT指导对超声(美国)指导的临床益处。方法:从监测,流行病学和最终结果和Medicare相关的数据库中鉴定了463名患者的群组。使用Cochrane-Armitage测试评估了使用图像引导的时间趋势。使用COX回归模型,逻辑回归模型和广义线性模型分别评估图像引导和生存,并发症和成本的模态之间的关联。结果:使用CT引导的RFA急剧增加,从2002年的20.7%增加到2011年的75.9%。与CT引导的RFA相比,那些接受美国引导式RFA的人具有相当的群体和延迟后复杂性的风险。肿瘤大小的分层分析也没有统计学显着差异。在调整后的存活分析中,在整体和癌症特异性存活中没有观察到统计学上的显着差异。尽管如此,CT-Guided RFA(2847美元)的成本高于美国引导的RFA(1862美元)。结论:尽管随着时间的推移快速采用,CT引导RFA的程序成本比美国引导的RFA更高,但没有显着改善后期复杂性和生存。呼应美国内科委员会选择明智的竞选和美国临床肿瘤学会的癌症护理倡议的价值,从我们的研究呼吁的调查结果表明CT引导RFA是否为HCC患者提供高价值护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号