首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >Understanding Patients' Preferences: A Systematic Review of Psychological Instruments Used in Patients' Preference and Decision Studies
【24h】

Understanding Patients' Preferences: A Systematic Review of Psychological Instruments Used in Patients' Preference and Decision Studies

机译:了解患者的偏好:对患者偏好和决策研究中使用的心理仪器进行系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Research has been mainly focused on how to elicit patient preferences, with less attention on why patients form certain preferences. Objectives: To assess which psychological instruments are currently used and which psychological constructs are known to have an impact on patients' preferences and health-related decisions including the formation of preferences and preference heterogeneity. Methods: A systematic database search was undertaken to identify relevant studies. From the selected studies, the following information was extracted: study objectives, study population, design, psychological dimensions investigated, and instruments used to measure psychological variables. Results: Thirty-three studies were identified that described the association between a psychological construct, measured using a validated instrument, and patients' preferences or health-related decisions. We identified 33 psychological instruments and 18 constructs, and categorized the instruments into 5 groups, namely, motivational factors, cognitive factors, individual differences, emotion and mood, and health beliefs. Conclusions: This review provides an overview of the psychological factors and related instruments in the context of patients' preferences and decisions in healthcare settings. Our results indicate that measures of health literacy, numeracy, and locus of control have an impact on health-related preferences and decisions. Within the category of constructs that could explain preference and decision heterogeneity, health locus of control is a strong predictor of decisions in several healthcare contexts and is useful to consider when designing a patient preference study. Future research should continue to explore the association of psychological constructs with preference formation and heterogeneity to build on these initial recommendations.
机译:背景:研究主要集中在如何引发患者偏好,较少关注为什么患者形成某些偏好。目标:评估目前使用哪些心理仪器,并且已知对患者的偏好和健康有关的决定产生哪些心理构建仪器,包括形成偏好和偏好异质性。方法:进行系统数据库搜索以确定相关研究。从所选研究中,提取了以下信息:研究目标,研究人口,设计,心理维度,以及用于测量心理变量的仪器。结果:鉴定了三十三项研究,其中描述了使用验证仪器测量的心理构建与患者的偏好或与健康有关的决策之间的关联。我们确定了33个心理仪器和18个构建体,并将仪器分为5组,即激励因素,认知因素,个人差异,情绪和情绪以及健康信念。结论:本综述概述了医疗环境中患者偏好和决策的心理因素和相关仪器的概述。我们的结果表明,卫生识字,衡量标准和控制权的措施对健康有关的偏好和决策产生了影响。在可以解释偏好和决策异质性的构建体中,控制的健康轨迹是在几种医疗保健环境中的决策的强烈预测因子,并且在设计患者偏好研究时可考虑考虑。未来的研究应继续探索心理构建与偏好形成和异质性的关联,以建立这些初步建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号