首页> 外文期刊>Transport Reviews >Machine learning applications in activity-travel behaviour research: a review
【24h】

Machine learning applications in activity-travel behaviour research: a review

机译:活动 - 旅行行为研究中的机器学习应用研究:综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper reviews the activity-travel behaviour literature that employs Machine Learning (ML) techniques for empirical analysis and modelling. Machine Learning algorithms, which attempt to build intelligence utilizing the availability of large amounts of data, have emerged as powerful tools in the fields of pattern recognition and big data analysis. These techniques have been applied in activity-travel behaviour studies since the early '90s when Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) were employed to model mode choice decisions. AMOS, an activity-based modelling system developed in the mid-'90s, has ANN at its core to model and predict individual responses to travel demand management measures. In the dawn of 2000, ALBATROSS, a comprehensive activity-based travel demand modelling system, was proposed by Arentze and Timmermans using Decision Trees. Since then researchers have been exploring ML techniques like Support Vector Machines (SVM), Decision Trees (DT), Neural Networks (NN), Bayes Classifiers, and more recently, Ensemble Learners to model and predict activity-travel behaviour. A large number of publications over the years and an upward trend in the number of published articles over time indicate that Machine Learning is a promising tool for activity-travel behaviour analysis and prediction. This article, first of its kind in the literature, reviews these studies and explores the trends in activity-travel behaviour research that apply ML techniques. The review finds that mode choice decisions have received wide attention in the literature on ML applications. It was observed that most of the studies identify the lack of interpretability as a serious shortcoming in ML techniques. However, very few studies have attempted to improve the interpretability of the models. Further, some studies report the importance of feature engineering in ML-based studies, but very few studies adopt feature engineering before model development. Spatiotemporal transferability of models is another issue that has received minimal attention in the literature. In the end, the paper discusses possible directions for future research in the area of activity-travel behaviour modelling using ML techniques.
机译:本文评论了采用机器学习(ML)技术的活动 - 旅行行为文献,用于实证分析和建模。机器学习算法,试图利用大量数据的可用性构建智能,已成为模式识别和大数据分析领域的强大工具。当人工神经网络(ANN)用于模拟模式选择决策时,这些技术已经应用于90年代早期90年代以来的活动行为行为研究。 AMOS是一个在90年代中期开发的基于活动的建模系统,在其核心上有了模拟和预测对旅行需求管理措施的单个反应。在2000年的曙光中,由Arentze和Timmermans提出了一种基于全面的基于活动的旅行需求建模系统的信天翁,使用决策树提出。从那时起,研究人员一直在探索像支持向量机(SVM),决策树(DT),神经网络(NN),贝叶斯分类器等的ML技术,最近,集合学习者来模拟和预测活动行为行为。多年来,随着时间的推移,公布文章数量的大量出版物表明,机器学习是活动 - 旅行行为分析和预测的有希望的工具。本文首先在文献中,审查这些研究并探讨了应用ML技术的活动旅行行为研究的趋势。此次审查发现模式选择决策在ML应用程序上的文献中受到了广泛的关注。观察到大多数研究将缺乏可解释性作为ML技术中的严重缺点。然而,很少有研究已经尝试改善模型的可解释性。此外,一些研究报告了基于ML的研究中特征工程的重要性,但在模型开发之前,研究采用了很少的研究。模型的时空可转移性是在文献中得到最小的关注的另一个问题。最后,本文讨论了使用ML技术的活动行为行为建模领域未来研究的可能指示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号