首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion medicine >National comparative audit of blood transfusion: 2014 audit of transfusion services and practice in children and adults with sickle cell disease
【24h】

National comparative audit of blood transfusion: 2014 audit of transfusion services and practice in children and adults with sickle cell disease

机译:输血国家比较审计:2014年儿童和成人的输血服务和实践审计镰状细胞病

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Summary Objectives To determine the organisational resources in place; what blood was being transfused, why, how, where, when and by whom; whether laboratory support and policies met standards for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Background SCD affects 14?000 people in the United Kingdom (UK). Standards and guidelines do not cover all aspects of transfusion in SCD and there are no data on their use; people may become very sick without warning presenting to non‐specialist hospitals; blood services are increasingly supplying units for transfusion in SCD with little data on their use. Methods A retrospective audit of transfusion services/practice for people with SCD who had received a transfusion in January‐July 2014 in participating hospitals in the UK and Republic of Ireland (ROI). Results Eighty‐four hospitals submitted 1290 cases, 75% of cases came from 18 hospitals submitting 25 or more cases. Transfusions (91.2% [1164/1276]) were administered to patients with HbSS, 60% (732/1227) of patients needed Rh CE negative blood. Transfusion episodes (4528) were recorded, of which 84% were elective. Stroke prevention accounted for 42% of all transfusions; adults received 56% of transfusions of which 50% were automated red cell exchange (RCE), children received 44% of transfusions of which 87% were simple transfusions. Conclusions There was a paucity of appropriate clinical management protocols, adequately trained staff and network arrangements. The high numbers of children being transfused, disparity in transfusion modality between children and adults and the high frequency of the CE negative Rh phenotype were noted.
机译:摘要目标确定组织资源;什么血液被转发,为什么,如何,何处,何时以及谁;无论是实验室支持和政策是否满足镰状细胞疾病(SCD)的患者的标准。背景SCD影响英国(英国)的14 000人。标准和指南不涵盖SCD中输血的所有方面,并且没有数据使用;如果没有警告,人们可能会变得非常恶心,而不是向非专家医院提交;血液服务越来越多地提供用于在SCD中输血的单位,其使用很少。方法对2014年1月至2014年1月 - 7月在英国和爱尔兰共和国(ROI)的参加医院收到输液的SCD的分输送服务/练习的回顾审计。结果八十四名医院提交了1290例,75%的病例来自18家医院提交25个或更多案件。输血(91.2%[1164/1276]给患有HBSS的患者施用,60%(732/1227)患者需要RH CE阴性血液。记录输血剧集(4528),其中84%是选举值。卒中预防占所有输血的42%;成年人收到56%的输血,其中50%是自动化的红细胞交换(RCE),儿童收到44%的输血,其中87%的输血性分输出。结论有缺乏适当的临床管理协议,训练有素的员工和网络安排。注意到儿童和成人之间输血方式的高次数,差异和CE阴性RH表型的高频率。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transfusion medicine》 |2020年第3期|共10页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 治疗学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号