首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >Failed rib region prediction in a human body model during crash events with precrash braking
【24h】

Failed rib region prediction in a human body model during crash events with precrash braking

机译:在具有预制制动期间的碰撞事件期间人体模型中的肋区预测失败

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: The objective of this study is 2-fold. We used a validated human body finite element model to study the predicted chest injury (focusing on rib fracture as a function of element strain) based on varying levels of simulated precrash braking. Furthermore, we compare deterministic and probabilistic methods of rib injury prediction in the computational model.Methods: The Global Human Body Models Consortium (GHBMC) M50-O model was gravity settled in the driver position of a generic interior equipped with an advanced 3-point belt and airbag. Twelve cases were investigated with permutations for failure, precrash braking system, and crash severity. The severities used were median (17kph), severe (34kph), and New Car Assessment Program (NCAP; 56.4kph). Cases with failure enabled removed rib cortical bone elements once 1.8% effective plastic strain was exceeded. Alternatively, a probabilistic framework found in the literature was used to predict rib failure. Both the probabilistic and deterministic methods take into consideration location (anterior, lateral, and posterior). The deterministic method is based on a rubric that defines failed rib regions dependent on a threshold for contiguous failed elements. The probabilistic method depends on age-based strain and failure functions.Results: Kinematics between both methods were similar (peak max deviation: X-head = 17mm; Z(head) = 4mm; X-thorax = 5mm; Z(thorax) = 1mm). Seat belt forces at the time of probabilistic failed region initiation were lower than those at deterministic failed region initiation. The probabilistic method for rib fracture predicted more failed regions in the rib (an analog for fracture) than the deterministic method in all but 1 case where they were equal. The failed region patterns between models are similar; however, there are differences that arise due to stress reduced from element elimination that cause probabilistic failed regions to continue to rise after no deterministic failed region would be predicted.Conclusions: Both the probabilistic and deterministic methods indicate similar trends with regards to the effect of precrash braking; however, there are tradeoffs. The deterministic failed region method is more spatially sensitive to failure and is more sensitive to belt loads. The probabilistic failed region method allows for increased capability in postprocessing with respect to age. The probabilistic failed region method predicted more failed regions than the deterministic failed region method due to force distribution differences.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是2倍。我们使用经过验证的人体有限元模型来研究预测的胸部损伤(根据变形的肋骨骨折,基于元素应变的功能),基于模拟的预压制制动。此外,我们比较计算模型中的肋骨损伤预测的确定性和概率方法。方法:全球人体模型联盟(GHBMC)M50-O模型是重力,在配备高级3点的通用内饰的驾驶员位置稳定皮带和安全气囊。用失效,预防制动系统和崩溃严重程度进行了12例。使用的严重程度是中位数(17kph),严重(34kph)和新的汽车评估计划(NCAP; 56.4kgh)。失效案件使能除去肋骨骨元素,超过1.8%有效塑性菌株。或者,在文献中发现的概率框架用于预测肋骨衰竭。概率和确定性方法都参与考虑位置(前,横向和后部)。确定性方法基于标题,其定义失败的肋区,依赖于邻接失败元素的阈值。概率方法取决于基于年龄的应变和失败功能。结果:两种方法之间的运动学相似(峰值最大偏差:x-head = 17mm; z(头)= 4mm; x-thorax = 5mm; z(胸部)= 1mm)。概率故障区域启动时的座椅皮带力低于确定性失败区域启动的时。肋骨骨折的概率方法预测肋骨中的更大区域(模拟用于骨折),而不是它们等于的1个情况的确定方法。模型之间的失败区域模式是相似的;然而,由于压力从元素消除减少而导致的差异导致概率的失败区域在没有预测确定性失败区域之后导致概率失败的区域。结论:概率和确定性方法都表明了对Precrash的影响的类似趋势制动;但是,有权衡。确定性失败的区域方法对故障更敏感,对皮带负载更敏感。概率故障区域方法允许在年龄的后处理后提高能力。由于力分布差异,概率故障区域方法预测了比确定性失败区域方法更多的失败区域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号