首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >Cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent road traffic injuries in low- and middle-income countries: A literature review
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent road traffic injuries in low- and middle-income countries: A literature review

机译:干预措施的成本效益,以防止低收入和中等收入国家的道路交通损伤:文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: The objective of this study was to identify, critically appraise, summarize, and synthesize evidence from cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of interventions aimed at preventing road traffic injuries (RTIs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) by age group and road users targeted.Methods: A search strategy was applied to 12 electronic databases for studies published between May 2002 and August 2015 that met prespecified inclusion criteria. Additional studies were identified by contacting authors and searching bibliographies. Included studies were critically appraised against published criteria and a narrative synthesis was conducted including a use of the strength of evidence criteria.Results: Five studies were included in the final review that reported 9 interventions. Only 2 out of 9 interventions (drink-drive legislation with enforcement via breath testing campaign and combined interventions for reducing RTIs) showed moderate evidence of being cost-effective, whereas the evidence of cost-effectiveness of other interventions was weak. Only 2 interventions (bicycle and motorcycle helmet use legislation and enforcement) were explicitly targeted to children, young people and vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists. The cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent RTIs in LMICs ranged from US$4.14 per disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted for building speed bumps at the most dangerous junctions that caused 10% of junction deaths in the area studied to US$3,403 per DALYs averted for legislation and enforcement of helmet use by motorcyclists in the World Health Organization (WHO) sub-Saharan Africa region.Conclusions: Evidence of cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent RTIs in LMICs is limited, particularly for children, young people, and vulnerable road users. Evaluation of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a larger number of possible road safety interventions in a variety of LMIC settings is warranted to generate the evidence base for effective traffic injury prevention programs.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是识别,批判性评估,总结和综合旨在防止低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)的道路交通损伤(RTIS)的成本效益分析(CEA)的证据年龄组和道路用户有针对性的。方法:在2002年5月至2015年5月期间发布的研究策略适用于12次电子数据库,符合预计纳入标准。通过联系作者并搜索书目来确定额外的研究。包括的研究严重评估了公布的标准,并进行了叙述性的合成,包括使用证据标准的强度。结果:五项研究被列入报告9干预措施的最终审查中。在9个干预中只有2个(通过呼吸测试活动的执法和组合干预措施的饮用机关立法和减少RTIS的干预措施)表明了适度的证据表明具有成本效益的证据,而其他干预措施的成本效益的证据是薄弱的。只有2次干预(自行车和摩托车头盔使用立法和执法)被明确地针对儿童,年轻人和脆弱的道路用户,如行人和​​骑自行车者。用于防止LMICS的干预措施的成本效益范围从每年4.14美元的价格为4.14美元(DALYS)避免了在最危险的交界处建造速度颠簸,这导致该地区的10%的交界死亡人数为每达尔多斯3,403美元避免了世界卫生组织(世卫组织)撒哈拉以南非洲地区的摩托车手的立法和执行盔甲使用.Conclusions:用于预防LMIC中的RTIS的干预措施的成本效益的证据是有限的,特别是儿童,年轻人和脆弱路用户。评估在各种LMIC设置中获得更多可能的道路安全干预措施的有效性和成本效益,因此有必要为有效的交通损伤预防计划产生证据基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号