...
首页> 外文期刊>Thrombosis and Haemostasis: Journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis >Joint assessment in von Willebrand disease Validation of the Haemophilia Joint Health score and Haemophilia Activities List
【24h】

Joint assessment in von Willebrand disease Validation of the Haemophilia Joint Health score and Haemophilia Activities List

机译:von Willebrand的联合评估血糖联合卫生评分和血友病活动名单的疾病验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Assessment of clinical outcome after joint bleeding is essential to identify joint damage and optimise treatment, to prevent disability. However, disease-specific tools to assess the musculoskeletal status in patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) are lacking. We aimed to determine validity and reliability of the Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) and Haemophilia Activities List (HAL) in patients with Von Willebrand disease (VWD). Ninety-six patients with VWD were included (mean age 46 years) of whom 27 had more than five documented joint bleeds. The HJHS was performed in all patients and all patients completed the HAL and Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA) questionnaires. Health-related quality of life (SF36) results were obtained from the prior 'Willebrand in the Netherlands' study. Joint X-rays of knees, elbows and ankles were scored according to Pet - tersson (PS). Internal consistency of the HJHS (Cronbach's alpha (alpha)=0.75) and HAL (alpha=0.89) were good. Inter-observer agreement of the HJHS was good (ICC 0.84; Limits of Agreement +/- 10.3). The HJHS showed acceptable correlation with the X-ray PS (Spearman's r (r(s))>0.60 all joints) and HAL (r(s)=0.71). The HAL also showed acceptable correlation with the SF36 physical functioning (r(s)=0.65) and IPA (r(s)=0.69). Hypothesis testing showed adequate discriminative power of both instruments: in patients with a history of >5 versus 5 5 joint bleeds (median HJHS 10 vs 2 (p<0.01); median HAL 77 vs 98 (p<0.01)), independent from age. In conclusion, both the HJHS and HAL are feasible to assess clinical outcome after joint bleeds in VWD.
机译:关节出血后对临床结果进行评估对于确定关节损伤并优化治疗至关重要,以防止残疾。然而,缺乏疾病特异性工具,以评估von Willebrand疾病(VWD)患者的肌肉骨骼状态。我们的旨在确定血尔联合卫生评分(HJHS)和血友病活动列表(HAL)的有效性和可靠性(VWD)的患者。其中九十六名患有VWD的患者(平均年龄46岁),其中27名有超过五个文件的联合出血。 HJH在所有患者中进行,所有患者都完成了HAL和对参与和自主权(IPA)问卷的影响。与荷兰研究的先前的“Willebrand获得了与健康相关的生活质量(SF36)结果。根据PET - TERSSON(PS)评分膝盖,肘部和脚踝的关节X射线。 HJHS的内部一致性(Cronbach的alpha(alpha)= 0.75)和Hal(alpha = 0.89)很好。 HJHS的观察者间协议很好(ICC 0.84;协议限制+/- 10.3)。 HJHs显示与X射线PS(Spearman的R(R(S))> 0.60所有接头)和HAL(R(S)= 0.71)相关的相关性。 HAL还显示出与SF36物理功能(R(S)= 0.65)和IPA(R(S)= 0.69)的可接受的相关性。假设检测表明,两种仪器的充分辨别力量:患有> 5历史的患者,5例接合渗流(中位HJHS 10 Vs 2(P <0.01);中位数HAL 77 VS 98(P <0.01)),独立于年龄。总之,HJHS和HAL都是可行的,可在VWD中关节出血后评估临床结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号