...
首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science. >Common Filing Deficiencies in Abbreviated New Drug Applications Containing Clinical Endpoint Studies
【24h】

Common Filing Deficiencies in Abbreviated New Drug Applications Containing Clinical Endpoint Studies

机译:缩写新药含有临床终点研究的常见归档缺陷

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The objective of this report is to summarize common deficiencies identified in the filing reviews of abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) with clinical endpoint bioequivalence studies and skin irritation, sensitization, and adhesion (I/S/A) studies received by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2007 and 2017, to help applicants avoid common deficiencies, minimize "refuse-to-receive" (RTR) actions, "information requests," and ANDA approval delays. Methods: Multiple internal FDA databases were searched to evaluate and summarize common deficiencies identified in ANDA submissions containing clinical endpoint studies and skin I/S/A studies that required review by the Division of Clinical Review. A total of 275 ANDA submissions with filing reviews from January 2007 to June 2017 were analyzed in this report. Results: Two hundred eighteen (79.3%) filing reviews contained one or more deficiencies. Seventy-nine (28.7%) ANDAs were issued RTR letters because of major clinical deficiencies, specifically bioequivalence and clinical deficiencies, accounting for 9% of overall identified deficiencies. Twenty-two other categories of deficiencies are summarized into 4 main categories: missing information related to the clinical studies other than data sets (38%), missing data sets (35%), formulation issues (12%), and organization/format issues (6%). Conclusions: The most common deficiency in the "missing information related to the clinical studies other than data sets" category was "missing clarification of information" (22%). We also noted that the Division of Filing Review has identified these same types of deficiencies since assuming responsibility of the filing assessment for ANDAs with clinical endpoint BE studies and skin I/S/A studies. In conclusion, to minimize "refuse-to-receive" actions, "information requests," and approval of ANDA delays for generic drug products, applicants should submit full clinical study reports, including all data sets for drug products recommending clinical studies.
机译:背景:本报告的目的是总结缩写新药申请(ANDAS)的临床终点生物等效研究和皮肤刺激,敏化和粘附(I / S / A)研究中确定的常见缺陷2007年至2017年期间的食品和药物管理局(FDA)为帮助申请人避免常见的缺陷,最大限度地减少“拒绝接收”(RTR)行动,“信息请求”和ANDA批准延误。方法:搜索多个内部FDA数据库,以评估和总结含有临床终点研究和皮肤I / S / A研究所识别的常见缺陷,以临床审查所需的审查。在本报告中分析了2007年1月至2017年6月审查的275股和A提交审查。结果:二百十八(79.3%)申请审查含有一种或多种缺陷。七十九(28.7%)ANDAS是发出的RTR信件,因为主要的临床缺陷,特别是生物等效性和临床缺陷,占整体确定的缺陷的9%。其他两种类别的缺陷总结成4个主要类别:缺少与数据集以外的临床研究相关的信息(38%),缺少数据集(35%),制定问题(12%)和组织/格式问题(6%)。结论:“缺失信息与数据集以外的临床研究相关信息”类别中最常见的缺陷是“缺少信息澄清”(22%)。我们还指出,申请审查司已经确定了相同类型的缺陷,因为假设临床终点的申请评估责任是研究和皮肤I / S / A研究。总之,为了最大限度地减少“拒绝接受”行动,“信息请求”和通用药品延误的批准,申请人应提交全临床研究报告,包括推荐临床研究的药品所有数据集。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号