...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery: official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons >Lateral Extensile Approach Versus Minimal Incision Approach for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Displaced Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures: A Meta-analysis
【24h】

Lateral Extensile Approach Versus Minimal Incision Approach for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Displaced Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures: A Meta-analysis

机译:横向扩展方法与最小的切口接线接近分布和内部固定的偏移内部骨折:META分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures remains controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this large meta-analysis was to report the outcomes of the lateral extensile approach versus the minimal incision approach including complications, anatomic reduction, functional outcomes, and timing and to report results when only randomized control trials were compared. Five electronic databases were searched for articles directly comparing the 2 above approaches. Inclusion criteria included articles published from January 2007 to April 2017, adults (>18 years old) with closed, Sanders type II or III fractures, mean follow-up time of >= 12 months, and >= 1 primary outcome reported. Seventeen randomized control trials and 10 retrospective studies were included. There were 2179 participants with 2274 fractures, and mean follow-up of 22.41 months. Our results revealed no statistically significant difference in Gissane's angle, calcaneal width, calcaneal length, deep infection, or subtalar stiffness. When taking into consideration only randomized control trials, there was no statistically significant difference between groups comparing postoperative Bohler's or Gissane's angle. There was a statistically significant difference in wound complications, superficial infection, sural nerve injury, visual analog scale (VAS) and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, operative time, time to operating room, calcaneal height, and postoperative Bohler's angle (when all studies were considered), all in favor of the minimal incision approach. These results remained statistically significant when only the randomized controlled trials were compared, with the exception of Bohler's angle and VAS and AOFAS scores. The results of this meta-analysis indicate that the minimal incision approach is a good alternative to the standard lateral extensile approach. (C) 2019 by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. All rights reserved.
机译:脱位的关节内骨折的处理仍存在争议。因此,该大型荟萃分析的目的是报告横向扩展方法的结果与最小的切口方法,包括并发症,解剖减少,功能结果和时序,并在比较随机对照试验时报告结果。将五个电子数据库进行了直接比较了上述方法的文章。纳入标准包括从2007年1月至2017年4月出版的文章,成年人(> 18岁),砂光砂器II型或III骨折,平均随访时间> = 12个月,> = 1主要结果报告。包括十七项随机对照试验和10项回顾性研究。有2179名参与者,2274名骨折,平均随访22.41个月。我们的结果显示,红叶角度,转析宽度,性钙质长度,深感染或子间隙刚度没有统计学上显着差异。考虑到只考虑随机对照试验时,术后Bohler或Gissane角度的组之间没有统计学上显着的差异。伤口并发症,浅表感染,血管神经损伤,视觉模拟(VAS)和美国矫形脚和脚踝社会(AOFAS)分数,手术时间,手术室,转析高度和术后波坡角度的统计学意义(当考虑所有研究时),都赞成最小的切口方法。当Bohler的角度和VAS和AOFAS分数除外,这些结果在比较随机对照试验时仍存在统计学意义。该元分析的结果表明,最小的切口方法是标准横向扩展方法的良好替代方案。 (c)2019年由美国脚和踝外科医生。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号