首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Comparison of Electrocardiography Markers and Speckle Tracking Echocardiography for Assessment of Left Ventricular Myocardial Scar Burden in Patients With Previous Myocardial Infarction
【24h】

Comparison of Electrocardiography Markers and Speckle Tracking Echocardiography for Assessment of Left Ventricular Myocardial Scar Burden in Patients With Previous Myocardial Infarction

机译:心电图标记和散斑跟踪超声心动图评估患者患者患者患者心肌梗死患者左心室

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Myocardial scar burden is an important prognostic factor after myocardial infarction. This cohort study compared assessment of left ventricle scar burden between pathological Q waves on electrocardiography (ECG), Selvester multiparametric ECG scoring system for scar burden, and global longitudinal strain (GLS) by speckle-tracking echocardiography 6 months after myocardial infarction. The scar burden was defined by late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance as fraction of total left ventricle tissue. ECG measures were presence of pathologic Q waves and Selvester scores. GLS was the average of peak strain from 16 left ventricle segments. In 34 patients aged 58 +/- 10 years (mean SD), the scar burden was 19% (9, 26) (median [quartiles]) and 79% had scar burden >5%. Patients with scar burden >5% more frequently had pathologic Q waves (63% vs 14%) and had worse Selvester scores (5 [3, 7] vs 0 [0, 1]) and worse GLS (-16.6 +/- 2.4% vs -19.9 +/- 1.1%). Pathologic Q waves, Selvester scores, ejection fraction, and GLS related to scar burden in univariable analyses. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting scar burden >5% was 63% and 86% (pathologic Q waves), 89% and 86% (Selvester score), 81% and 86% (ejection fraction), 89% and 86% (GLS), and 96% and 71% (combination of Q waves, Selvester score, and GLS). In conclusion, Selvester score and GLS related to scars 6 months after myocardial infarction, and pathologic Q waves were only weakly associated with scar and GLS was associated with scar independently of ECG markers. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:心肌瘢痕负担是心肌梗死后的重要预后因素。该队列在心电图(ECG)中病理Q波之间的左心室瘢痕负担的比较评估瘢痕负荷,在心肌梗死后6个月通过斑点跟踪超声心动图,斯维斯特多游戏,以及全球纵向应变(GLS)。疤痕负担由晚期钆增强心脏磁共振定义为总左心室组织的一部分。心电图措施是病理Q波和校长分数的存在。 GLS是来自16个左心室段的峰菌株的平均值。 34例患者58岁+/- 10年(平均SD),疤痕负担是19%(9,26)(中位数[四分位数])和79%的疤痕负担> 5%。疤痕负担的患者频率较高,病理Q波(63%与14%)较差,并且均具有较差的Selvester分数(5 [3,7] Vs 0 [0,1])和更差的GLS(-16.6 +/- 2.4 %vs -19.9 +/- 1.1%)。病理Q波,塞维斯特评分,射血分数和GLS与瘢痕负担有关,无论是直立的分析。检测瘢痕负荷的敏感性和特异性> 5%为63%和86%(病理Q波),89%和86%(Selvester评分),81%和86%(喷射分数),89%和86%(GLS) 96%和71%(Q Waves,Selvester评分和GLS的组合)。总之,塞维斯特评分和GLS与心肌梗死后6个月相关的伤疤,病理Q波才与疤痕有弱相关,而GLS与ECG标记的瘢痕相关。 (c)2017年Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号