首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Incidence and Management of Restenosis After Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Disease With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents (from Failure in Left Main Study With 2nd Generation Stents-Cardiogroup III Study)
【24h】

Incidence and Management of Restenosis After Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Disease With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents (from Failure in Left Main Study With 2nd Generation Stents-Cardiogroup III Study)

机译:治疗未受保护的左主要疾病后再狭窄的发病率和管理(从左主题与第2站 - CardioGroup III研究中的左主题失败)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Incidence, predictors, and impact on prognosis of target lesion revascularization (TLR) for patients treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) on unprotected left main (ULM) remain to be defined. The present study is a multicenter study including patients treated with a second-generation DES on ULM from June 2007 to January 2015. Rate of TLR was the primary end point. All cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis were the secondary end points. A total of 1,270 patients were enrolled: after a follow-up of 650 days (230 to 1,170), 47 (3.7%) of them underwent a re percutaneous coronary intervention TLR on the left main, 22 during a planned angiographic follow-up. Extent of coronary artery disease was similar among groups (median value of Syntax of 27 +/- 10 vs 26 +/- 9, p = 0.45), as localization of the lesion in the ULM. Of patients reporting with TLR on ULM, 56% presented with a focal restenosis, 33% diffuse and 10% proliferative. At multivariate analysis, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus increased risk of TLR (hazard ratio [HR] 2.0: 1.1 to 3.6, p = 0.04), whereas use of intravascular ultrasound resulted protective (HR 0.5: 0.3 to 0.9, p = 0.02). At follow-up, rates of cardiovascular death did not differ among the 2 groups (4% vs 4%, p = 0.95). At multivariate analysis, TLR on LM did not increase risk of all cause death (HR 0.4: 0.1 to 1.6, p = 0.22), whereas cardiogenic shock and III tertile of Syntax portended a worse prognosis (HR 4.5: 2.1 to 10.2, p = 0.01 and HR 1.4: 1.1 to 1.6, p = 0.03, respectively). In conclusion, repeated revascularization after implantation of second-generation DES on ULM represents an unfrequent event, being increased in insulin-dependent patients and reduced by intravascular ultrasound. Impact on prognosis remains neutral, being related to clinical presentation and extent of coronary artery disease. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:在未受保护的左主(ULM)上对未受保护的左主(ULM)治疗的患者对目标病变血运重建(TLR)对靶病变血运重建(TLR)的发病率,预测因子和影响。本研究是一项多中心研究,包括从2007年6月至2015年1月对乌尔姆的第二代DES治疗的患者。TLR的率是主要终点。所有原因死亡,心肌梗塞,靶血管血运重建和支架血栓形成是次要终点。注册了1,270名患者:在650天(230至1,170)后,650天(230至1,170),其中47(3.7%)在计划的血管造影后随访期间经过经皮冠状动脉干预TLR。冠状动脉疾病的程度在群体中相似(27 +/- 10 vs 26 + / -9,p = 0.45)的术语,作为ulm病变的定位。患者报告与TLR对ulm的报告,56%呈局灶性再狭窄,33%扩散和10%增殖。在多变量分析中,胰岛素依赖性糖尿病患者的风险增加了TLR的风险(危险比[HR] 2.0:1.1至3.6,P = 0.04),而使用血管内超声导致保护性(HR 0.5:0.3至0.9,P = 0.02)。在随访中,2组的心血管死亡率在2组中没有区别(4%vs 4%,p = 0.95)。在多变量分析中,LM上的TLR没有增加所有因子死亡的风险(HR 0.4:0.1至1.6,p = 0.22),而术语的心底生休克和III Tertile预期预后(HR 4.5:2.1至10.2,P = 0.01和HR 1.4:1.1至1.6,P = 0.03)。总之,植入二代DES utm后重复的血运重组代表了一个不牢荡的事件,在胰岛素依赖性患者中增加,并通过血管内超声减少。对预后的影响仍然是中性的,与冠心病患者的临床表现和程度有关。 (c)2017年Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号