...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of school health >A Systematic Review of Tools Measuring Nutrition Knowledge of Pre‐Adolescents and Adolescents in a School‐Based Setting
【24h】

A Systematic Review of Tools Measuring Nutrition Knowledge of Pre‐Adolescents and Adolescents in a School‐Based Setting

机译:在基于学校的环境中测量青少年前青少年和青少年营养知识的系统综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Measurement of nutrition knowledge is common in interventions targeting dietary modifications in a school‐based setting. Previous research has noted a general lack of disclosure regarding the details and psychometric properties of nutrition knowledge tools, which makes uptake of previously used instruments extremely difficult. METHODS Our systematic literature review sought to identify interventions measuring nutrition knowledge in school settings to students aged 9 to 18. Studies were categorized according to content subject and relevant descriptive characteristics and psychometric properties were extracted. RESULTS Following the initial screening of 16,868 articles, 308 papers were evaluated for eligibility. Sixty‐seven studies consistent with the inclusion criteria were included in the review. A minority of studies reported analysis of validity (31.3%) and/or reliability (40.3%), and 73.1% of studies had at least one unknown relevant descriptive characteristic. The majority (68.7%) of studies were custom developed, of which only 13 reproduced the tool in the publication. CONCLUSION Overall, there was an alarming lack of reporting across studies, both in terms of the description of knowledge tools as well as their psychometric properties. These omissions make the selection of appropriate instruments for use in novel contexts difficult, and highlight the need for greater disclosure and pre‐intervention testing.
机译:摘要背景测量营养知识在校有基于学校环境中的饮食修改的干预措施中是常见的。以前的研究已经注意到营养知识工具的细节和心理测量特性普遍缺乏披露,这使得以前使用的仪器非常困难。方法采用我们的系统文献综述寻求识别衡量学校环境中的营养知识的干预措施给9至18岁的学生。根据内容对象进行分类,提取相关的描述性特征和心动测量性能。结果在初始筛选16,868篇文章后,评估了308篇论文的资格。六十七项与纳入标准一致的研究包括在审查中。少数研究报告了有效性分析(31.3%)和/或可靠性(40.3%),73.1%的研究具有至少一个未知的相关描述特征。大多数(68.7%)的研究是定制的开发,其中只有13次在出版物中转载了该工具。结论总体而言,在知识工具的描述和心理测量性质方面,跨研究缺乏报告缺乏报道。这些遗漏使得选择适当的仪器用于新颖的环境困难,并且突出了更大的披露和前介入测试的需要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号