首页> 外文期刊>The journal of ECT >Concomitant Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation With Ultrabrief Electroconvulsive Therapy A 2-Week Double-Blind Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial
【24h】

Concomitant Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation With Ultrabrief Electroconvulsive Therapy A 2-Week Double-Blind Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial

机译:伴随颅脑直流刺激超电压治疗A 2周双盲随机假期试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective The feasibility and effectiveness of concomitant use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has not been investigated. The study principally aimed at determining whether tDCS when combined with ECT improved the speed of antidepressant response. Secondarily, the ease of generation of seizures during electroconvulsive therapy and cognitive outcomes were investigated. Methods Consecutive patients referred for ECT to treat major depression were randomized to tDCS with dorsolateral prefrontal electrode placements (n = 8) or sham (n = 8) used daily and just before thrice weekly, 6 times threshold, right unilateral ultrabrief (0.3 ms) pulse width ECT. Change of depression severity was determined using the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale along with cognitive assessments using Montreal Cognitive Assessment and visual memory testing at weeks 1 and 2, which were compared with baseline. Results Change of depression severity from baseline was similar in tDCS and ECT compared with sham tDCS and ECT at week1 (mean [standard deviation {SD}] = 16.00 [6.78]; 13.75 [7.83]; P = 0.89) and at week 2 (mean [SD] = 23.00 [4.96]; 19.75 [9.85], P = 0.08). No between-group differences were obtained in the cognitive tests at weeks 1 and 2. Combining tDCS with ECT resulted in higher restimulation: 62.5% requiring 3 stimulations to achieve threshold in contrast to 12.5% with sham tDCS and ECT (P = 0.04). The mean suprathreshold dose was higher in the tDCS and ECT group compared with sham tDCS and ECT: mean [SD] = 144.0 [43.54] and mean [SD] = 122.4 [20.36], P = 0.04, respectively. Conclusions Concomitant use of tDCS with ultrabrief right unilateral ECT is feasible and safe albeit with higher rates of restimulation when tDCS was combined with ECT. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the speed of antidepressant response or cognitive outcomes at weeks 1 and 2 after the commencement of treatments.
机译:目的尚未调查伴随经颅直流刺激(TDC)与电耦合治疗(ECT)的可行性和有效性。该研究主要旨在确定TDC是否与ECT结合时改善了抗抑郁症响应的速度。其次,研究了在电耦合治疗期间癫痫发作和认知结果的易发力。方法对ECT的分类患者将主要抑郁症的连续患者随机化为DDCS,用背侧层前额定电极放置(n = 8)或假(n = 8),每天使用,只是在每周三次之前,6次阈值,右单侧超超图(0.3毫秒)脉冲宽度ect。使用蒙哥马利Asberg抑制评级规模确定了抑郁严重程度的变化以及使用蒙特利尔认知评估和第1周和2周的视觉记忆测试的认知评估,这些评估与基线进行比较。结果在TDCS和ECT中,与假期和ECT相比,在第1周(平均[标准偏差{SD}] = 16.00 [6.78]; P = 0.89)和第2周(意思是[SD] = 23.00 [4.96]; 19.75 [9.85],p = 0.08)。在第1周1和2周内在认知试验中获得组差异。与ECT结合的TDC产生更高的重置:62.5%,需要3个刺激,以与假TDCs和Ect的12.5%实现阈值(P = 0.04)。与假TDCs和Ect相比,TDCS和ECT组的平均Suprathreshold剂量较高:平均值[Sd] = 144.0 [43.54],平均值分别[Sd] = 122.4 [20.36],P = 0.04。结论随着TDC与ECT与ECT结合时,伴随着使用超级性的TDC的使用率是可行的,尽管较高的重新刺激率较高。然而,在治疗开始后的第1周和第2周内抗抑郁症反应或认知结果的速度没有统计学上显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号