...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine >Third trimester ultrasound accuracy and delivery outcome in obese and morbid obese pregnant women
【24h】

Third trimester ultrasound accuracy and delivery outcome in obese and morbid obese pregnant women

机译:肥胖和病态肥胖孕妇的三个三个月超声精度和递送结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: Several studies have highlighted the negative impact of maternal obesity on ultrasound accuracy for fetal weight estimation (EFW). However, the evidence is conflicting. We aimed in our study to find if the ultrasound accuracy for EFW would differ or decrease in obese and morbid obesity classes. We also studied the mode of delivery within the same cohort. Methods: It is a retrospective study of obese patients with recorded BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 , class I and II (BMI: 30–39.9 kg/m 2 ) compared with extreme obese class III (BMI ≥40 kg/m 2 ), who gave birth after 28-week gestation of viable singleton, who had an ultrasound within 7 d of delivery with reported normal amniotic fluid and no major fetal anomaly; the EFW was consistently measured through Hadlock regression formula in the period of 2014–2015 inclusive. Differences between the EFW and actual birth weight (ABW) were assessed by percentage error, accuracy in predictions within ±10% of error and the Pearson correlation coefficient were used to correlate EFW with the ABW. The study’s secondary outcome was to study the mode of delivery and the rate of cesarean section in obese and morbid obese patients. Results: Total 106 cases fulfilled our criteria. Class I and II as the first group (n = 53). Class III as the second group (n = 53). Maternal and birth characteristics were similar. The Pearson correlation coefficient equal 1 in both groups. The overall mean absolute difference (MAD) in grams of the whole obese cohort was 242 ± 213. The MAD was 242 ± 202 and 242 ± 226 g for the first and second group, respectively (p = 1.0). The overall mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) in this obese cohort was 8%. The MAPE for the first and second group, respectively were 8 and 7% (p = 0.4). The overall rate of cesarean delivery was 60% (64/106) with no differences between the obese and morbid obese BMI classes. Sixty-six percentage (42/64) of these cesarean cases was for repeat cesarean section. Conclusion: Despite what has been previously reported about the negative impact of maternal obesity on EFW accuracy, we could not demonstrate this relationship in our obese cohort (MAPE <10%). In addition, we could not illustrate a significant difference in ultrasound accuracy across various obesity classes. However, we found a significantly increased rate of delivery by repeated cesarean section in this obese cohort. ? 2017, ? 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
机译:目的:几项研究突出了母体肥胖对胎儿重量估计(EFW)的超声精度的负面影响。但是,证据是矛盾的。我们旨在找到我们的研究,找到EFW的超声精度是否会在肥胖和病态肥胖课程中不同或减少。我们还研究了同一伙伴内的交付方式。方法:对肥胖患者的肥胖患者≥30kg/ m 2,I和II类(BMI:30-39.9 kg / m 2)进行回顾性研究,与极端肥胖Ⅰ类(BMI≥40kg / m 2)相比培育后28周的妊娠,在7天递送7天内,常规羊水和没有主要的胎儿异常; 2014 - 2015年期间的Hadlock回归公式一直衡量EFW。通过百分比误差评估EFW和实际出生体重(ABW)之间的差异,误差±10%内的预测精度,并且Pearson相关系数用于将EFW与ABW相关联。该研究的次要结果是研究肥胖和病态肥胖患者的递送方式和剖宫产率。结果:总计106例满足我们的标准。 I和II类作为第一组(n = 53)。 III类作为第二组(n = 53)。母亲和诞生特征是相似的。两组中的Pearson相关系数等于1。整个肥胖队列的克的总体平均绝对差异(Mad)为242±213.第一和第二组的疯子分别为242±202和242±226克(P = 1.0)。这种肥胖队列中的总体平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)为8%。第一和第二组的MAPE分别为8和7%(p = 0.4)。剖腹产率的总体速率为60%(64/106),肥胖与病态肥胖BMI课程没有差异。这些剖宫病例的六十六个百分比(42/64)是重复剖宫产。结论:尽管先前报道了孕产妇肥胖对EFW准确性的负面影响,但我们无法在肥胖队列(Mape <10%)中展示这种关系。此外,我们无法说明各种肥胖等级的超声精度的显着差异。然而,我们发现这种肥胖队列中的重复剖宫产率显着增加。还2017年,? 2017年Informa UK Limited,贸易为泰勒&弗朗西斯集团。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号