首页> 外文期刊>Journal de gyne?cologie, obste?trique et biologie de la reproduction. >Could we perform quality second trimester ultrasound among obese pregnant women? [Peut-on faire des échographies obstétricales de qualité chez les patientes obèses ? étude monocentrique sur 30 mois]
【24h】

Could we perform quality second trimester ultrasound among obese pregnant women? [Peut-on faire des échographies obstétricales de qualité chez les patientes obèses ? étude monocentrique sur 30 mois]

机译:我们能在肥胖的孕妇中进行高质量的孕中期超声检查吗? [可以在肥胖患者中进行高质量的产科超声检查吗? 30个月的单中心研究]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To compare the quality of second trimester ultrasound images and their anatomical quality scores among obese women and those with a normal body mass index (BMI). Materials and methods: This prospective study, which took place from 2009 to 2011, included every obese pregnant woman (prepregnancy BMI greater than 30 kg/m2) who had an ultrasound examination at 20 to 24 weeks in our hospital and a control group with a normal BMI (20-24.9 kg/m 2) who had the same examination. A single operator evaluated the quality of all images, reviewing the standardized ultrasound planes-three biometric and six anatomical-required by French guidelines and scoring the quality of the six anatomical images. Each image was assessed according to 4-6 criteria, each worth one point. We sought excellent quality, defined as the frequency of maximum points for a given image. Results: The obese group included 223 women and the control group 60. The completion rate for each image was at least 95 % in the control group and 90 % in the obese group, except for diaphragm and right outflow tract images. Overall, the excellence rate varied from 35 % to 92 % in the normal BMI group and 18 % to 58 % in the obese group and was significantly lower in the latter for all images except abdominal circumference (P = 0.26) and the spine (P = 0.06). Anatomical quality scores were also significantly lower in the obese group (22.3 vs. 27.2 ; P = 0.001). Conclusion: Image quality and global anatomical scores in second trimester ultrasound scans were significantly lower among obese than normal-weight women.
机译:目的:比较肥胖妇女和体重指数(BMI)正常者的中期妊娠超声图像质量及其解剖学质量得分。材料和方法:这项前瞻性研究于2009年至2011年进行,纳入了每位肥胖的孕妇(孕前BMI大于30 kg / m2),他们在我们医院进行了20到24周的超声检查,而对照组则接受了超声检查。接受同样检查的正常BMI(20-24.9 kg / m 2)。一位操作员评估了所有图像的质量,审查了法国指南要求的标准化超声平面(三个生物特征和六个解剖结构),并对六个解剖图像的质量进行评分。根据4-6个标准对每个图像进行评估,每个标准仅占1分。我们追求卓越的质量,即给定图像的最高点频率。结果:肥胖组包括223名女性和对照组60名。除diaphragm肌和右流出道图像外,每个图像的完成率在对照组中至少为95%,在肥胖组中为90%。总体而言,正常BMI组的卓越率从35%到92%不等,肥胖组的卓越率在18%到58%之间,在后者中,除了腹围(P = 0.26)和脊柱(P = 0.06)。肥胖组的解剖学质量得分也显着较低(22.3 vs. 27.2; P = 0.001)。结论:与正常体重的女性相比,肥胖的中期女性在超声检查中的图像质量和整体解剖学评分显着降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号