首页> 外文期刊>Peritoneal dialysis international: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis >Barriers to Increasing Use of Peritoneal Dialysis in Bangladesh: A Survey of Patients and Providers
【24h】

Barriers to Increasing Use of Peritoneal Dialysis in Bangladesh: A Survey of Patients and Providers

机译:孟加拉国腹膜透析使用的障碍:对患者和提供者的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Despite a lower requirement for technology and equipment than hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an underutilized modality in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). -Bangladesh has the lowest use of PD in the world (fewer than 2% of prevalent patients). We evaluated nephrologists' attitudes toward PD and examined differences between patients on HD and PD in Dhaka. We asked nephrologists to fill out an English-language questionnaire. Using convenience sampling but targeting both public and private hospitals in Dhaka, we asked trained nurses to administer a Bangla-language questionnaire to patients on HD (n = 116) and PD (n = 41). We validated the questionnaires on a sub-sample (n= 10 for each group). Of the 43 nephrologists surveyed, 27 (63%) had patients on PD. When compared with nephrologists without patients on PD, those with patients on PD were less likely to believe that survival and quality of life on PD was worse than on HD (odds ratio [OR] = 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05 -0.83 and OR= 0.11, 95% CI 0.02 -0.67 respectively) but were not more likely to have received training for PD. Nephrologists named cost of PD as the predominant barrier to increasing use of PD, followed by concerns about patient hygiene and lack of trained nurses. Fifty-two HD patients (45%) did not know about a home-based modality. When compared with patients on HD, patients on PD were more likely to have been educated by non-nephrologists about dialysis, to be "forewarned"about the need for dialysis, to be paying fully, and to be living in a permanent home with a non-communal water source. Some barriers to increasing access to PD-i.e., patient living conditions and cost-are unique to LMICs. Our study also highlights that issues encountered in high-income countries-i. e., nephrologists' subjective preference and lack of patient knowledge about an alternate modality to HD-may play a role as well.
机译:尽管技术和设备的要求低于血液透析(HD),但腹膜透析(PD)是低于中等收入国家(LMIC)的未充分利用的方式。 -Bangladesh在世界上最低使用PD(少于普遍患者的2%)。我们评估了肾病学家对PD的态度,并在达卡患者和PD患者之间进行了检查的差异。我们要求肾病学家填写英语调查问卷。使用方便抽样但针对达卡的公共和私立医院,我们要求培训的护士向HD(n = 116)和Pd(n = 41)上的患者提供孟加拉语问卷。我们验证了子样本上的问卷(每个组n = 10)。在调查的43位肾病学家中,27名(63%)对PD患者进行了患者。与没有PD患者的肾病学相比,PD患者的人不太可能相信PD的生存和生活质量比HD(差距= 0.21,95%置信区间[CI] 0.05 - 分别为0.83和或= 0.11,95%CI 0.02 -0.67,但并不容易获得PD培训。肾病学家名为PD的成本作为增加PD使用的主要障碍,随后对患者卫生和缺乏培训的护士缺乏担忧。五十二个高清患者(45%)不了解基于家庭的方式。与高清患者相比,PD的患者更有可能受到关于透析的非肾病学家教育,以“预示着”对透析的需求,完全支付,并居住在永久的家庭中非公共水源。增加对PD-I.E的访问的一些障碍。,患者的生活条件和成本 - 是LMIC的独特性。我们的研究还突出了高收入国家遇到的问题 - 我。即,肾病学家的主观偏好和缺乏关于HD-MOS的替代方式的患者知识 - 可能会发挥作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号