...
首页> 外文期刊>Urology practice. >Transrectal Saturation Biopsy Improves Risk Stratification (Reclassification) of Patients with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance
【24h】

Transrectal Saturation Biopsy Improves Risk Stratification (Reclassification) of Patients with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance

机译:癌症饱和度活检改善了前列腺癌患者的风险分层(重新分类)在积极监测中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: We assessed the accuracy of transrectal saturation prostate biopsy compared to extended prostate biopsy in patients on active surveillance. Determining prostate cancer aggressiveness is mandatory to determine appropriate candidates for active surveillance and appropriateness to remain on active surveillance protocols. Methods: From our institutional review board approved database we reviewed the biopsies of 277 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer on an active surveillance protocol. Eligibility criteria included clinical stage T1 to T2a, Gleason score 6 or less, prostate specific antigen 10 ng/ml or less and percent of positive cores 33% or less of the total cores taken on diagnostic biopsy. We defined recategorization or pathological progression on first confirmatory and surveillance biopsies as no longer meeting the standard definition of low risk by cancer volume or Gleason score criteria. Results: Of 444 biopsies 279 were extended prostate biopsy (10 to 14 cores) and 165 were saturation prostate biopsy (20 cores or greater). The rate of cancer recategorization (reclassification) was highest on the first confirmatory biopsy at 25%. There was no significant difference between extended and saturation prostate biopsy for detecting recategorization on the first confirmatory biopsy (21.5% vs 29.4%, p = 0.13). Saturation prostate biopsy was significantly more likely to detect cancer progression on all subsequent surveillance biopsies. Conclusions: Disease progression or recategorization was more frequently identified on the first confirmatory biopsy than on subsequent surveillance biopsies. The incidence of disease recategorization was higher in the saturation biopsy group than in the extended biopsy group on the first confirmatory biopsy but the difference was not statistically significant. Disease progression was more likely to be identified by saturation prostate biopsy on subsequent surveillance biopsies.
机译:介绍:我们评估了癌症饱和前列腺活检的准确性,与患者在积极监测中的延长前列腺活检相比。确定前列腺癌症的侵略性是强制性的,以确定积极监测和适当的适当候选人,以留在积极监测议定书上。方法:来自我们的机构审查委员会批准数据库,我们审查了在主动监测议定书中诊断出患有前列腺癌的277名患者的活组织检查。资格标准包括临床阶段T1至T2a,Gleason得分6或更低,前列腺特异性抗原10ng / ml或更小,百分比的阳性核心核心核心诊断活检的总核心。我们在第一次确认和监测活检时定义了重建或病理进展,因为不再达到癌症体积或GLEASES评分标准的低风险的标准定义。结果:444个活检279延长前列腺活组织检查(10至14个核心),165例是饱和前列腺活组织检查(20个芯或更大)。癌症重复化(重新分类)的速率最高,在第一个确认的活检下为25%。延伸和饱和前列腺活检之间没有显着差异,用于检测第一验证活检的重新分类(21.5%vs 29.4%,p = 0.13)。饱和前列腺活组织检查显着检测所有后续监测活检的癌症进展。结论:疾病进展或重复化比在后续监测活检中更常见于第一次验证活检。饱和活检组的疾病重新化的发病率高于延长的活组织检查,在第一种确认活检中,但差异没有统计学意义。在随后的监测活组织检查中,更有可能通过饱和前列腺活组织检查鉴定疾病进展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号